Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

PROFITS' 01? TONTINE INSURANCE!. ' ' A policy-holder, who had insured with the Colonial Mutual life Assurance Society, Ltd.', brought an application before his Honour Mr. Justioe Denniston at a Banco sitting of the Supreme Court: yesterday afternoon. Mr., Blair appeared for plaintiffs, William Boyd, farmer, and his ivife, Mary Boyd; the • Attorney-General,' Dr. Findlay,'-K.C.,'with Mr. Toogood, appeared for the defendant aim-: pany. The claim' arose out of'a : modified tontine policy on the life of William Boyd, issued by the defendant company in,; December, 1887. Plaintiffs claimed that;- by a representation in writing made by an agent, ,H. Palmer, the defendant company undertook that the . cash value of tho policy at the end of twenty years should bo ~£165. , At, the expiry of that term the company informed plaintiffs that the surrender value of the policy was ,£64 tiffs asked that the company should be ordered: either.to mike good the alleged. representation' of .£165, or pay back the premiums paid, amounting t0:.£109, with interest at 5 per cent., amounting to £86, or a total of .£195. • : ■ The caso, bad been before Mr. Justice Denniston;and a jury of four, elovsn months ago,, and the finding of the jury negatived fraud on .the part of tho agent,with regard to certain other representations alleged , to hayo . been made.' , ...... ~- •' .-•

Tho' question for the decision of the'.Court was whether a written document supplied by the company's agent, and headed "A, Good Invratment"''was a.representation' which tho company was bound to. mako :go6d. Tho com-pany-disputed- liability on the: ground-that the statements, in : tho document .we're set out as and., vcere not' in - any 'wijj binding on tho • cotnpany. . ,Mr. Blair contended that the company hid made a f also representation; having' named the profits at' considerably rnoro than tliey turred out to- be. • .-■■• • . Tho Attorney-Qfineral- truoted..authoritics« lo show that of-a. tontine policy Jfruj no.t entitled to rccover the difference, if any, betweori ;tho amoiint tMdorDd-by, tSo : .company J.and„,the.Jamount;i;epresonted.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091102.2.55

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 653, 2 November 1909, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
321

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 653, 2 November 1909, Page 6

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 653, 2 November 1909, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert