WEEKLY DAY OF REST.

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 647, 26 October 1909, Page 6

WEEKLY DAY OF REST.

ti:|B^|t^K3;^i^^iTEris;;;,;;.; ■:f fjfftEMpKS >A. '■ MILLAB. tte i& 'Tra'aes-' S Corigibes Raited; :'uppny,the,,; Hon.;.. J. fVpAV-Millar^MmsteT;fofLabow).last,night, in KlSbirapportCpf'. tlfeYprop'osaTifcat 'the 'work • of-hotel: 1 .;:;■:■ ':- [ -■.:■.::■■: „■'//, ■■■' in introtaeihg/the'depu■£;'^iltion;^aMd' fii already' the-law' in 'several European ; countries. TB-?Tlier£-\roSl<l?have'^ ';#> ih':the':BiU/,to ?raeet '..the /case:Ofr those &£\ and - the ;te£-printirig/pf'.newspapers.'on'- Sundays.. ■-■~;,-..-., v*;W*:.Th#Tkbn- J; ; T.--Paul'supported the principle on the ?Sv;B^te,'::b^ / Vof;;W fe;:Vehina.'Ne*' 'Zealand in labour legislation could ''iv,'emptiohs''.in'-Italy;-wero; ; 's«am6n.'.and. railway I^worlers;/ considering the of' praer; pbssibte JSunday .should :be. the. day s ; i^^'-f.est, v ;bn^:as alternative,'; twenty-four '&$ ' he given'weekly.. : :M.P;;:;pomted.outthat i the i'V^putation. the. .whole '•fc;,^f^ganisedVteb6ur,::in;New,.Zealand, and its ! *S> !^im; ;waß:baokeiiby ; Mligious'andhumanists Question: affected the whole. :&S" ; so^iUfe , '•■ .;- : : .,' ~..:V. ■*r> '■: ''-(.''.Mr. '■>%,■ ■■&'■ Carey, (sebretary/of-the Cooks.; and Jftof-TOiteryih.''country.hotels;worked.-a,;hundred w#E while'-.the'towri employees put, in 'siiV'aißht;:houraS ion; which;:thfi7, : .got viXi their \;;, J-.; j:-. : V l y? : -,-:Mi\?EAJ. Careyi(6ecTetary of .the Cooks' and Minister.-had-not an'amendment oi the '#'$cF£nic* ;would vbeneflt/.the;vlfl,o<!o: :or 12,000 ■&~ sorkW^KthejcalUng^h^/rip^nted..; -■, j(Auc}claJia)'a&o ;ieferred;'to,;the V'nours,"v 'ompjoyees ''■':'- Vuiraed.''''.''^' : ;'? ' '^'^r-- - i! ; ' ] :'-.'/-:- ' ; - ,■;' ;:X ' '. s^'i;Mti'Ksheri-Whatvdo; they, get?;. .'-..>.,■.,; •_ ;Sl:?^^Mr/X^:i'Hotel*pbrters:;get.abound. a.-.week-'■V'' I '--"-'- '".v ' t/£fe;Mt.';WTight;;;M,P.;\>Uo :spoke;.in support, of Millar agreed .with S'::'?'ie*:.'deputatiori;,that Parliament could, legislate. y^ ; lfit'liked.vHe;could not support Mr. Fishers ;: 5 ;: because ."it'; would 'ambiint -to -legislation. C:;i!or:the ; one'section,of :, v'ierii'-^Sbmething^pracWcable:'was '.very 'desir-. SH«:'haa ..prepared a' Bill, wlich'v was ' M priated;^ailas wuldvbe ;introauced;r providing >'H iwork v onJy ' ; : ? ?60' and 'females 56 hours;- ' The.. "'} '■ '■'< haif-hdliday« ' eonli : : be -accumulated, for three i«>'nibiitna; iS whßn. a full, weeVßholiaay; on full pay ; ! 'the "employee:• wM-dis,, ((••.Tnissed '.before./^^thatV : :timß,.'he / would.-.bei ] paid ;t^*o^OT^meVra^:fpr; : all; : ;the:M hadnot SMr/Carey'v'The^ .fe'if'ra.'houm''during ; . ■t*^'f ?bff; : ?;vS-'' ':i: ; f- !: ■-[ V ; ..:vv;^:^i:"'K v l&S: The Mihisferi That, nover; struck me before. , l :Care^Tney/winld:;;do-;it;.will^ V%Mr:'.Millar;stated I'that;-to/allow of,;evidence regarding'the'ronditions,under "SSwhich-' the "deputation's /■•. proposal:'' could be ai^^rtea,'''M|wbdd-'agree'ito^^ ?jifjef Kshjerfs-Bill,;;ptd'f6rma,'';'andi its -refer-: K r fence'-to:'thei ; Labaurrßills,'Committee.; :' Mr.. fey,h^x^-'m^jj{ ft.U j^k --y '..,. ". { .'