Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

YIELD TESTIN.

CAKTHWON'S CONTESTS: COUNT. 4 •' WHO IS "No, 2i"?/ ,-"No. 21" (whoever that may be.; among tne members' of the Dalefield Yield-testing Aseocia-' tion) ,ie'an honoured individual. On the verdict of the Dairy Commissioner's Staff he has the best herd of cows around Carte'rton. That is, .if, their'performance on last month's icai ; ing day.3 be a; true criterion. The records in ,the first interim report of. the yield-testing operations of those Dalefield -suppliers \>».ose herds were entered in the contest/ have bton tabulate-1 by the Dairy Commissioner's staff in accordance with the Minister's scheme, and xirculnted to the members of the Carterton, Yield-testing Association. They/ will prove' vory interesting, to -those those who happen to know the "various secret herd numbers. It will prove interesting also to outsidere.who will be able to .see'what manner of-performance the herds of the champion" butter-fat district can put up.;.."While No. 21, (one of the "big men") has the best herd so> far, No. 8 (ono of the "little men,' 1 with only, thirteen cows); has the best single cow in the whole five .hundred. One wonders if Uejknew her distinguished value before. ; Twenty-six.'herds ' ure taking- part. The yield of. each cow has'been calculated for the full; period (whether the cow lias been milking all that period or not) for the sake , of making, comparisons imore apparent, accurate, and in-, structive. The-average cow of the herd producing the highest record for.fat topped the list ■' at 38.831b. of butter-fat for the month, and at an average test of 3.4 l pe'f. cent. The lowest yield was from a herd which, averaged 5.C31b. of fat per cow for the. saino. period— 131b.' of (if. per cow in the one .month. Valuing'fat-'at Is. per lb., this.makes a difference ot 13s. per cow for the month of September. On a hem of thirty cows this would amount to JSI9. t !Os.,;'. ;[ .,-.,.••' J , The cow giving 'the -highest'individual yield (pr/-'thWmonth produced'.'S6.3Bl6. , 'of-fat. >. The ■lowest 'producer ,-gave-;.1U21b, ',of fa£ for.'the' sairie' time."'The' respective'vaWesr'-at Is.'per lb. for' fat would be" £2 165.; id'.'-.nnd 11s. 6d., or it would take about five cow.s' of : tlie stamp of the smaller producer to yield is. much fat as one. cow .equal-.to the best. ■•-';/.; ~ ■-':''■■-.,

j The , ; average.v.cow .',' of the'■•• association , gave' about•'MOltt'i'ofi milk,'- testing "3.s'per ,cent.,'arid yioldirig' 32:901b. 'of L fat;'-' tertainly iiidi- , , dotes-that -therO'-are many' good c'bws'fincluded l in| the number tested. The.report of the test-; ing officers is as follows:— '.■■■."'•", ' •'■:'■•'

He rd fco j 2 3 „ r 4 5 G 7" 8 ' 9 10 11 12 13 14 " 15 10 17 18 19 20 2J. 22 23~ 24 25 26^ No of'cow« 21 ■ 32 18 • 24 " 23 23 26 • 13-" . • : 18 ■ 7 ~ -18 28 . 14 15 20- 18 21 10 _ 18 15 25 19 20 30 25 25^ - Millc per oow, 1 lb- -1039 64 - 761 25 9S6 2- r ' 904-06 1067. 1080.86 1032.7- - 947.8 964.35 . ; 061.11 1077.6 . 947.7 877. 964.75 ..;973.28 .972,23 879. - ..813.75 JQ32.5, 893.52 ,735yl2 7.67.25 1138.5 1)12.3 100.0.8 . j*S:er.u;e tcst : -- "3 61 3 63 : - 3 '47 339 3.13 : x 3/56-. " .3.48 .'*3 4 3 07 3 47 3 1 3 68 -it 3 92 3 22 3 51 3-43 - '3 69 , 3 51 3 49 3 43 3 41 3 57 3 6 Average fat, IV 37 58 27 65 33-27 30-72 ; 26.97 ,34.70, 33.85 -36,76 33.05- 33.15 : 33.4-5 37.26 29.42 32.23 35.72 , 38.15 31.33 . -30.91; 27.91 38.06 31.36 25.63,. 38.83 32.58 36.03 milk, lb 1605 1027 5 1177 5 1230- '975. 1305. 1342.5 -1222.5 1155. 1440. 1530. 1005. 1305. 1155. J402.5 1087.5 914. 922.5 1245. 1230. 960- 810. .. 1297.5 1215. 1342.6 Be t com, (« t 34' 39 35 41 38 38 4~-5 42 34 34 32 J4 38 4 42 4 39 42 39 +3 33 38 4 42 4 4 Best cow, fat, lb - ' - 54 57 40 07 41 21 - 50 43 37.05 49.59 54.' 41.56 39.27 > 4S.08 52.02 .40.47 _:52.20 ' 48;51.r, -56.10 42.42 39.69 35:98 40,5?. 36.48 32.40 54.49 , 48.60 . 53.70 Wof t co«, milk, lb 855 652 5 727 5 «S0 480 793 GSQ, 457 5 937.5 585. 960 . 802 5 300 705.-, 555 652 690 547.5 - 990 750 495 . 765 720 562 5 705 "Worst cow, teMt_: - 3-6 2-5 -- 3.1 2-8 ~ 2.4 2.7 £G ., : .3,9 4.1. 3.4,-. 4.3 ; 3.1.; 2.5 _ 4.4 , 3.6 - 4.4 3.2 3.2 3.4 .2-3 2.9 3.3- 3-< . 3- 2 2 8 Worst cow, fat, lb: - 30 78 163l'~ 22-55 " 18-48 i' 11.52. 21.46 1&) -26.01- 18.76» 31.87- ; 23.15 29.76 . 20.06 13.2 25.38 24.42 20.88 22.08 18.61 21.75 16.33 26 64 18- 19-<4

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091011.2.74.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 634, 11 October 1909, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
761

YIELD TESTIN. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 634, 11 October 1909, Page 10

YIELD TESTIN. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 634, 11 October 1909, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert