Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHEN DOCTORS DIFFER.

.-,:'.'; A CARPENTER'S' DEATH. :■ ; '• -V CLAIM FOE COMPENSATION. /Unusual circumstances were disclosed yesterday, when', the ;widow and family of the lato/'Robert /Robinson;-;carpenter,, of Welling-. tonj ..claimed .£453.: compensation' under the Workers' Compensation 'Act from \ Campbell and :. Burke, • 'builders and contractors,'- Wellington. ''The case was taken-by the Arbitration': Court,, with Mr. Justice Sim and Mr. J. A. M'Cullbugh (workers' representative) on the bench. ' '•■•'.'"■." ; , The facts were that Robinson, on' October 26, 1908; when working at his .trade for .the'.-;re-, ■spondents,-fell off a.-scaffold and. injured.-his hip: Ho made a partial recovery and went to Canterbury in December for a change. While 'there, he died/oh .January. 8, 1900. The ques- : Hon I '., was-, whether d<Sath was due t0... the. injuries received, through the, accident, or to .other causes.-" Respondents : contended - that ideath Was caused by pneumonia arid influenza. Claimants' -case was that," the cause, was pyaemia; resulting from thej accident, or that if pneumonia or influenza was a proximate cause 'of death, 'it was rendered fatal' by .the. results of the accident. ■ It was admitted ■ that :the-.claimants /were ;total .dependents, of de'ceased; that.'the'accident occurred, during his. •ordinary' employment in ; the service of the respondent firm,--and 7 that the respondents had :p'aid.the'deceased';Cls,:at.therate of £1 10s. a, : week, .between the date of the accident and his .death.'.' ■.'■';.'.-y ,'. -,',''■'■

'.Mr.'Fair-appeared; for claimants, and-Mr. Balcombe Brown for/respondents. -. '.'-.'■■-.■ .'• Mary Robinson, widow- of ■ deceased, said 'that deceased was'stiU:suifering : when he ..went to Christchurch'in'December./and had to .walk 'with a stibkr'ftnd- was using lotion. She -had' to rub : the place',-.night'jand morning..- He had at that time..avsmalt,white spot.on the -hip,' and this.>sp6t bo. touched without great-pain. : -The'-hip. was still..'swollen.'-. She' aid riot' See him again.. ■'..''. ../'...' ! To'; Mr.: Brown: Her ; husband, when he went .away, said'ihe; was 'pretty- well,, but. for his • hip:■' It-,was still, very painful, and hurt when 'shevtubbed.it.-..; /..,. .-' / • ; ; John; , William;";'. Robinson,... letter-carrier, ißangiora.vSph-. of deceased, 'said his father, icam'e'.to vifit 'him'at .Rangiora on December ;21,;;and stayed';;there 'from' that date.' De- ' oease'd' : had considerable pain with' his hip, and /Witness hod .to' call in a ■doctor^'Hvho at.first' said deceased was .suffering ;from'"stomach.trouble,/but afterwards said5 it was influenza.' 1 . After.-a. time,-swellings ap'pe'ared oh',the legs' ahd-shoulders, ahd'the doc-/ '■t6'r,!then"said there'appeared to be blood-poison-?ingA;'He "said -nothing. about.' .pneumonia, arid .thevfirst." time' witness-met' with. such/a sag-igeStion-was -cut the- death certificate. '-, ■■;■'• To/Mr ; ,Brown::Witness.did not think "ofa. .pWt-mortemV' examination,' . though he'recogfnisW at,;.the-time Ithat' the.', certificate .'was Against a : 61aiin'''under" the Workers' Compoh-. ;s'atioh Act.. 'His father'died on/ January<B,' 'and/was Juried next.day. . ... ../,''"'•■', 'Evidence. Was7also given by.the'wife.of,the; ■last';witness, arid:by/the.daughter of deceased;

; i. '' ; Medical Testimony.-; ;. . :X' / .'":Dr. ; ;;T. 'A..'Willsi'.who 'attended deceased;at 'Eangiora, said that;on,his first, visit, he con-: oluded: that deceased;was suffering from influenza lvjth.gastric .symptoms.:.He.could not remember' exactly what: h'esaid "to' the relatives. ;He came again .the .same afternoon, ■ and mado a more;.de,t'ailed'''exami.nation,.'butsaw no reason to .alter his/opinion/ r He thought it'was .when he..sawvhim' next,.:on'.January 2, that he' was told' of . theVaccident." He/was 'told'that /the.. patient had, a terrifio: fall, and witness concluded that, .according to the information, -he might have 'suffered;some 'injury ■; to ; the chest.. He.;examjned. the:.patient's, injured .-hip,: but. beyond;.;aV slight,-discoloration,.ithere, was:.nbthing.t'apparentlyvaniiss. ...Handling, the, .part' diA'not.seem .t6givo';ihe, ; patientany,pairi. Oh. ; he examined thepatient's knee, and ! found a conditiori.'e'xabtly'analogous' to "housemaid's ' knee." '.'As' far :as ..his ; memory went there were no sighs of injury to the skin, and' therewas'not niuoh. swelling on the foot. There was; a Ismail-patch; oh', the left'foot, and-this 6pot was, : very tender. 'On January B:witnessfound bubbling sounds'in 'deceased's ohest.'and:, diagnosed thV-oase-'-as',one of. brbnohial :pneu- j monia,: following'influenza. : 'This was a frequent complication., The.spotß mentioned were attributed 'by .him, to'.'clotting of: the blood. -They v jienftP ! ','th£{ , ' : the l . , .man's heart was riotf standing "the, strain,,', and '.were partly due "to, th6,..coagulability-.ofi the ..blood being, inqrease'd. by'.iinfluenza.'-;-:He:considered there: pyaemia andno' septic action. His "certificate stated "influenzal:-'pneumonia;". which.. was otherwise'called bronchial pneumonia. <• He had said: nothing s about-blood-poisoning until the point was-brou'ght up: byAone. of the relatives. Then,-.finding.that they- were, anxious .on .that matter,, he.;gave.'.,ah "anti-toxin, .saying .'that if there; w;as ,anything : :of.that sort, 1 it, .would .■ do.. him'gobd.'>,-' ,-V '■ ■■■'••■ ■ .'■.-■' '. : -. ?-.•• ■' .-".•' -'. .-I To/Mr'. Brown:'vln.his] opinion.' the. injury, to-' the' hip' had no thing rto do with -Ithe : influenza : or the pneumonia/ : , ' :;.,:-:.■ ■ To his Honour:, The fall could only have been connected with : the influenza on the -supposition : thaty.the'.' abcide'nt 'had -'resulted 'in "'a.lowered vitatity.y.: 1 ;.;-.'.' "". ';;.",V:'':V: ■./;. ';■'■- ;''■;; J: ,"i '-■ : •- To Sfr.Vßrbwh: 'A- person in robust health, was as 'likely.'-as-'- any- other tb'.contract influenza.. ..'■ Pr. i '.Cahill,-of Wellington, said '"he ascribed death'"to. ; pyaemia,.. : which'wa6-a:forin'of bloodpoisoning.'; He. formed' : this; opinion : from, the symptoms': as'-'stated.. by the: relativesY:' .Henoticed that .Dr.! Wills,' .while.' describing thd,case as ..a severe.-attack of influenza, had said .that. the .temperature'was 102, whereas influehza"was usually'accompanied; by'a;very high; tempera-. ture.,'-.-Dr;>WilU's ( .statement.as to the deceased's. kiiee.:did::iibt ; i preclude ;.the possibility of .some, form ;of 'blood-poisoning.-' ■'', - "'■>■ '■': Tb';- r Mr'. 'Brown was attending -•■ deceased -'f Or: 5. 'or 6; : week? .before-he'left for- ; the south',, and ;sawj no'reason-'to fear future trouble from.-, blbbd-pqispning.„: He. had -given a icertifi; date.: that»the' ; patient,was, fit' to -travel. ;'';.,..'.. :> Dr." James; -Wellington; '~ said - he. never. at- . deceased; 'but after /what he; had' heard: in'the court, : and assuming! that the illness: had,been'oOrrcctly. describe'd by:'the-.relatives,- he. ,wa's-,pf-.the):opinion that.deceased suffered from pyaemia, l and that -this was,- the cause of death. ' DnTEwart,;. Wellington, expressed-.the : same opinion;" 5 ::,;,::''-'";:'-'.-;:;..--: .'—'-.'., ~'■'" ■'. ■:'•■ i.'DxJ. Albert;'Martin;:also gave .evidence in supof. ; pyaemia. :• .■..■'•,..;.

','^V,Case : .; ■ : lir/'-Brbwnj -'in ;'opening for the/defence, con.tended: I 'that' the !Court-.could' not- ignore'■■;'.the of Dr. -Wills, and rely' instead -upon-thatof the relatives,'• nh'ich;was'ih-dennite^inconsisteht;.and-.interested. '■: ■ '■:''Drl Ealke, : Wellington/said he.considered Dr.: Wills's. evidence consistent Tvith.an attack "of infl(ieh£a',' : but'he-.did not think it :was a case of'pyaemia;'-. The-sytaptoma [were •entirely ..consistent .with.'iniluenza.and bronchial; pneumonia/. 1 '.'";','.' K ' : ' ',■>-;>'::: '■" -.-•■'.' : '.'•' '.'■■'-. '. :'■':' ■Ernest...Edward 'Hammond, Wellington 1 manager of' the 'South ; ' British Insurance Company, Limited,. said that ; ':deceased' just before going south told him' that : he hoped ; to be fit to work ili a,week,:arid;was going' to spend the'interval in Canterbury, but might; stay a fortnight; Deceased ;also.. said; he felt 'perfectly well in'him-self.v'v.'-',:':--''..:.-:''K'.v..:'-,;''"'':-'-.---''.'-' '■ '■ ! Dr. Erncst'William Giesen, Wellington, medical ; advisor to the South. British' Insurance Company,:.having .'heard: all: ; the previous evidence, ■'anchoring.seen/deceased:.: three/times between his'.'accide'nt-'ftnd-ihis■ departure for' Canterbury,' :said : T th.e.';diagnosis.;of T Dr. Wills seemed to him to ;be torr^ot;v;s:;',_■-,'■ ; ;' ' .iTh'e'Court'.wili-'give'its decision when..:fully constituted ; by. the appointment of anomployr er's'i-representativb/' •'''.'.•■.'• ■ :' '.''"■

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090903.2.43

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 603, 3 September 1909, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,023

WHEN DOCTORS DIFFER. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 603, 3 September 1909, Page 6

WHEN DOCTORS DIFFER. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 603, 3 September 1909, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert