Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CASUAL LABOUR V. WELLINGTON HARBOUR BOARD.

Sir,— Having read Mr. M'Laren's state* mont that Mr. Burton did not mnko his ro-' marks to tho Harbour Board with tho con. sent of tho union, is it not a fact that Mr, M'Loren was an'accessory after tho fact seeing ho did not inform tho board at tho time, that Burton's statements M-cro not mado with the union's consent? I have cowo to the conclusion, that Mr. M'Larcn must share tho responsibility with Burton.—l am, etc., UNIONISE July 9/ 1909.' . ' ' • '. [A number of lettcis aro crowded out, and will appear on Monday.'! '

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090717.2.86.31

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 562, 17 July 1909, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
99

CASUAL LABOUR V. WELLINGTON HARBOUR BOARD. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 562, 17 July 1909, Page 10

CASUAL LABOUR V. WELLINGTON HARBOUR BOARD. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 562, 17 July 1909, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert