ARBIRTATION LAW.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS. Idi T*LiQrfAra— Pnsss association.) ■, Mr 7 I, tiu Dunedln, May 13. ««« • ± - ggs i * Conciliation CommissaT'h mterYl6 T ed a " Time 3" reporter, T® of °P mion that an amendment was desirable in tho. direction of simplifying procedure by bringing • casoa on Wthn H w'■ Co ' mci^ « taking thorn LV r l'° n o CoUr ?- More latitude bnould lie given the Commissioner in brineffP?" 8 ,«<*, and arriving 'ai a™t I 'f u iT tllat 'ettleinent was arrived at, it should either have the full forco j °i. n awa , r,1 > °r bo spnt on to the Court, and bo made into an award without any Toference.to the Council of Concflit tion. He preferred tho latter alternative because there might be some question of iiandtd WtU n gal , Phraseology better handled bv the Court., There would also bo an additional check on any errors that !'!frli. Cro u Up in , connection .with drafting awtrds. He understood, something .might bo done during the ensuing session of Parliament m that direction.-
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090515.2.110
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 508, 15 May 1909, Page 14
Word count
Tapeke kupu
171ARBIRTATION LAW. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 508, 15 May 1909, Page 14
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.