Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUSTRALIAN WINE

•— j . AN IMPORTANT POINT. (lit TKLEGIm-ll —I'KESa ASSOCIATION—COI'miGHT.) (Rec. April 9, 4.15 p.m.) London, April 9. Referring to tlio Greenwich case, cabled on January 9, Mr. Taverner (Agent-General for Victoria) explains that tho Imperial Government holds that the uso of such terms as "Burgundy" and "Bordeaux" with the word "Australian" is legitimate, and does not conflict with tho Madrid Convention of 1891. The French Ambassador has been informed accordingly. In tho case mentioned in the above cablecram, the. proprietor of a small restaurant at A on- Cross was fined 205., with costs one shilling, for selling Australian, wine as "Burgundy." The wholesale firm who supplied him admitted that the bottles wero' labelled in error.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090410.2.36

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 478, 10 April 1909, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
116

AUSTRALIAN WINE Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 478, 10 April 1909, Page 5

AUSTRALIAN WINE Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 478, 10 April 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert