Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DARWIN CENTENARY.

A REVIEW. , EVOLUTION AND MODERN THOUGHT. In veiw of tho fact that tho present year h tlio centenary of tho birth of ; Charles ■ Darwin and also the fiftieth anniversary- of ■the 'publication -of ■ his book, ''Tho Origin of Species," ; the Rev. P. N.. Waggott recently: delivered a course of lectures in London onthe influence of Darwinism on 'religious,' sciontifio, .and philosophic ' thought. ■ Mr. ■ Waggett, who is. ono: of the Cowley Fathers (Anglican), is in every way, qualified to de^l : ;with.the subject. . Ho had a brilliant career. atOxford'a'nd gained".a ;first-class in natural ;■ science. . Ho has r made. a special.study 'of biology,.and is also well;abreast of the latest 1 devojopments of mo'dorri theology -and. philosp- , phy. -.lii^his.opening.:lectur'b'ho said:. ■ '-- ; -:V .The year 1909 will be a jear.of many cole-' I bratioris of Darwin, in meetings, books,, sbr-', : mons, speeches, and articles. There will be '. learned and unlearned expressions of opin- ' . ion' about Darwin and: his . doctrines; there may be some'reyival among believers ; ; and 1 their; critics.of the. first, and,as ; l think, ex- ■ aggerated, excitement. about, the 'theological ! beariiigs of the Darwinian theories;; some ef-; ; fort, I hope,-to appreciate our debt'to him; '.- some useful words of warning and encourage-. I' ment; a wider, knowledge,, r trust, .ofthe singularly; attractive charaoter. of a.-.very 1 great and humble, man.; . :.:'..,' I; am my- | self-, an. old-fashioned . iDarwinist;'-. , believing ' ystill-'-.iii. tho.general prevalence of : : natural 1 selection, believing what; is taught by "Weis-. ' manii.and by Poulton and not s . seeing at present (though I >havo' followed .the 1 hewj'studies)- any reason, -'for.''departing :from ['■ tho typical Darwinian. : .:standpoint... ;Oh. the ; OtHer- lhand,: -it. is ; hardly., necessary to say; '. .hero:l.vam-'.'a^Christian.;in the ordinary: and ' ■ tyjlioal .sense, .so'far'..as.".belicf::-is .concerned, 1 : ' believing the- Catholic creeds arid never -fur- :' ther; :_than now: from: departure..from'.'-':their; ' 'teaching. To some mejv- this; may seem an 1 abnormal, position.. Ho me it,is profoundly , •'" .reasonable. I give it you; in order- thatybu, ' may know beforehand the kind of conclusiori ! to which I wish to : lead: you.; ' j : ;^i.;.:;;■ ' v ;, Evolution an Old Dootrlna.. "■ -,;'... ' (1) Whatj. then, s was-Darwin's special or; i■ characteristic. teaching: in' natural history P .'•■-. I ; We ;know'-that he taught evolution;.but it ! was hot in. this that he was original..-Evplu-> , tipn, was an old doctrine when Darwin.,wrote, - J . but it rwas a_ doctrine finding in his"day;few [: .supporters, ln.saying; then, that Darwin ( . -was' ript the;first -exponent-of' ■evolution,, we. itlust ■ add that his' theory 'of the ;manner;of : I' /evolution-' made: evolution;; itself,;credible as'• it l ;had'never :b'een' before .;"' fc l:';'.' J .v; _. ',-:. L, , Still;; Evolution ivas; an:' oidldoctrine.:;;Mariy, .' men' jri: different "ages/ and.countries"'thb'ucht' • theyJhad proof,' or conjectured -the prbbabil-: ~ ityj-that'the'different 'forms;-'of living i.erea-' j tures, animals; and plants had been | derived t by descent:from.fewer, or; very: fewj 'or,';ev.en ? from one 1 single form of lifo.' Descent ,w.itn: [■ modification .is -an ancient; doctririe.A It'.was .'■ found in China before ouii era.' ;It is found ■'. in.Aristotle. It was always at least a.notipn ':: accompanying the' study of; life. . '.In •; .the; ', ' ' seventeenth century in: England it was ,be- '' -lieved'- :'inj with .regard' ; at :loast : to certain ," foriris, and' it was not.' thought unorthodox: for .Christians. .'Finally, Darwin's timej presented it to the, world 'in " a great way which wo shall refer,-■• to.;pre-. ; r - sently ; and"The Yestige's of Creation":made, ' it almost popular by a treatmc'nt.which'is to-' '. .t6resting and clever; but.not groat prscienJ.- tific.' '".-. '-v.'v; ■■:. '. /■', : >'"'':'. v- , ; ';i':. '■.''■? '.'■-' - : y'.; '■■ "... iDarwin, .then,, .is' ribt.;the "first;"evolution-' "v .|sti'""eyen\'6f;'oiir.-..Mo'dem'''tiJnei 4 ';.' .': ;' "."''■:-,:". y ~-■ ;:'i-;; Darwin's Great: Predecessor./;; ; ; :';^' _ yWe .'must■deyote.a few';.words especially:.to' " his:great ( 'predecessbr, Lamarck. ,'Lamarokj a': •, Frenchman, 1 : prbduced his .thebry of .'evolution, .-. .1 think in. 1801, at any.rate'in tho Very first "'; ! years of .thei last century.- His work, the re-. . : suit of great talent,arid/industry, appeared,; , .you. see,.:duriiig:that, : . strange ..timo when j ';France, and aU'the world , because of France, j ;were.seething,in the.Heat and thunder , of the . Revoiation,.:when,France.was struggling..for : 'her-jie\v hold:in a'world'which-seemedmelted _ : like;,laya'.^.^This, li Franco' in; an activity in •scieMce-.stiefi as ihad f n'ever//been.^oep/,bof6rfl t .iat';leasli'--in!'. I '' l aturaL . history/' It.was V'tlme"also of,singular! a<>' j. tivity in another,,greatv.regioii- of thought", ■: mystical theology. What,: was':Lamarck's'.doc-. I trine?. He tauglitjv.as;Darwin did.later,;that i- all-animals and plants had.cpmo to their prej. sent forms by descent and 3 - "he attributed- v their-' differentiation',-their 1 special shaping",' "tb three 'principal causes: i firsty!.tb!o'direct--:effcc'fc :of:-thV-.conditions .of, 3;; lifo-^-theK'cburitryj'-or';the' sea,' thb s ,trees;;the - air/ heat, cold, moisture, drought, rocky, soil - or,deep;'scarcityj'.plenty,-: ciinflict, and■ ;re- ; pose. '.'Remember the direct effect, fbrlall.'be-; lieve that in. one way or" another these-con- ;: 'ditions affect'the-lives and forms' of animals ; and;plants,;'.';.;;." X.;': : ';;-''.: -.-.'•.'■.'.- ';'■ ■•'.-.',-■'.,.:; V;■' : ." ;■' i, : 'b. Lamarck's -.Second''forming'.;: forcei'':.is'';vthe c, crossing ,pf strains;:' a; factor'now" ; sb v ,bbth'",!Weis- "■' inariii'Jand'.Batesbn.': - r ;^ : '-'.'-"'-' : ':'?']. ,>-;';'; ;..;.'.".;. '."•Tho',tliir'd;iniluen(;e ; - is, thttt:;.to'. whibli-'.-the ' ■riam'6;;bf';L?mai , c!j;is;'most-specially^attached; ?|t is,;;..the-;Ms6'and,;''tUsusi3r'bf;the."organism ", and.it's."different' parts.s\'Lanlarck attributed "the. greatest' importance tb'' this';... Her tiught '' .jiha't-'-the effects of ; exercise;and; 'of effort 'are j; inherited,- and so. through .a series of genefL atiqns,:. accumulated in;tho. descendant; so y : tliat. slight differences; ,made. by effort, as the 5 effort/.of 'somo; primitiveiirregulate. to; : reaoh j tHeboughsbf; trees for food,: being accumuj lated .through ■. many ■. generations, < result ■■ in . that, abnormally: long neck and sloping back, and 'extraordinary : prehensile : -tongue . which •'. arecharactoristic -of the .giraffe..and .make ■-. him , what'; he'/is.-V This- is the greatest.of.:tho i ■"Lamarcliian.factors,!'-..-of.which.! you , , nave Q often read. -i;)-'.,- : C: ■•'.'• ; ..-. ; ; , ' : -.': i, ■:>.■■. J ,;';And;it -is,this which is almost',...but;.not f; quite," the foundation of Herbert Spencer's t ."Pririciples,of;Biology.''.^ Hβ .bclievedi, like - Lamarck,:'in-'-'direct,effect;".-in ''.use,effect." : •He:was'hot."a"Darwinian,'v.fpr,;.thpughvD.airwin J "allowed'■•jaV'stare^pj-'-. these';.'facto : rs/ ; ;,it-..'rwas ; -.'.& f ;sman.share..:-Natural selection is.ior;l)arwin i 'the great guiding; factor.';.- '':';•■] ; ■:%':.l-? i /If. is 'iworth'. remenibering ~ that:- Spencer; 1 •though." : an.;..evolutionist, is not a. Darwinist. ?. In his,;lifetime.he was,."among)'evolutionists, ?' the -.most /important of ,- the ■ opponents' of i; ;Darw'in...-.;"'.;') .-J'. ; .--•''/<:•.'; ;;- ; -.;'.■- ■,-:\ '■-.'■; ':■'■'s \ /:j)"-'v' ; v f ;--.;:; ' Natural Seledtlori/ .■;,;; '';-.v;; v . I ■ If • evolution is; not Darwin's special, or a original, contribution '•.to': -pur view-of the 1; j world,' what : is ? His special . contribution is I 1 the -theory; of; natural .selection, ;the.Vguide 11 of evplution, the .explanation' of adaptations. .! Even in : this, , his.- speoial |doctririe,.;he is-na-i turally not. without forerunners. Darwin's t preface to the seventh edition of "The Origin y. of, Species"- is the best- introduction to : these r .forerunners; : for he iwas always -a zealous': der- fender .of .other , .-men's fame.'; He. gives us ,'-.-.there.a: quotation from Aristotle, which shows -'; : in outline'the. ebneeption'"of-natfti-al seleotipii-, ■i ;'and;fuir.re'fefences't.o: tw"b,'remarkable pub- . 'lioa|ipnsj:'by/Pr;":W. 'in;'1813;-.arid \ I Mr.;)M^theW:.inaß3l>;' , W;e all- know; how ; •.AVallabe,'st'ill-living;ifpund.independently the same .."doctrine," and "published 1 a .paper side j by. ;side with Darwin's ..in .1858. : ; But. this ■ matter, requires ( ' more.- careful .explanation j than wol can.)now give. from tlio- materials which" , Wallace's' zeal for)' Darwin's ■'-' renown " has .'given .us. - . ■;.' :•';,. '.'■; ''!'■'.'■['■'.■.';.':, j. '; Darwin , taught ttat. the guidance of evolu-. _] tipn/.was-.'to be found .not, principally in'.the direct effect of .circumstances, but upon their; ' '"sorting , . , , or selective effect.-.,, Adaptations; j he.seeinedto see, came to exist'by a process j. of elimination, the elimination-. of the' unfit, •• so .that; tlio ■ fit, the adapted, , survivo.): ■'. Ho l. observed tho immense excess of bffspring^prp.du'eed" by plants ..and animals.'.; Hβ: observed that; the .offspring differed individually, in J- slight degree's: He believed that .this" excess , and ."this flight variation ,were universal", or' ■' very general. He saw thatby reason : of tlie .excess there must be competition or. struggle y "between the'individuals—struggle-v.fpr, : ithe I same food, tho same.prey;,'tho same.places. : of safety; .'competition :.)aniong. the weak; to " eScape'.the preying .struggle arid 5 ' cbmpotition. of- all And furtherj ,'.tha't , in the struggle those .must survivo who were . most /fitted to surviv.e, under 'the particular stress of..their _ case; tlio -fiercest,- swiftest {; lion, tho bost.hidden- hunter,-.the,best hidden. quan'yi)tlie swiftest in pursuit, the swiftest- ]' in flight, tho strongest to obtain food,;or the ! one best fitted to go without, food for long \ periods. •: In-all-cases tho'survival of tho i fittest,to survive is what.'we believe;in;: and , ~ w<3 seb, iiiider Darwin's "teaching, how there

would be , different .ways of surviving, and I consequently different forms .of /Survivors, * different sorts.of fittest, .. ." :; : : . ■".'.•;'.'.'Aristotle's Theory. V-'. ■"■ I .have"said enough to (distinguish Darwin's . doctrinb from that of Lamarck, and I will 0 only add. now. those words from .Aristotle 1 which seem remarkably to anticipate the • ;'■ general Hues of tho theory. /,. ' ..'> : :]'.:,.'■■ [\ 1 . Aristotle'says: "Wheresoever all the,parts n : of a: whole ; (that is of one organism) hayo ■: come to be in a form which : Buggests: that .'■ they were made' for the sake of some: pur-; r ,\pose, these parts were preoe-red..;. Having" j ■' been■' appropriately formed: (or fitted).by. an . e i internal spontaneity ; and whatsoever.things j ( i .were not .thus' suited; perished ; and still B v perish.".'. \'. Y ■•".". .'.'.'...••i •':'. ..'■ ; :■.■-■■■':-. t I ; That is'lo. say; ,p, find■'.adaptations, we, 0 : find things, suited to their work, because, if; t ; they are: not. suited \they perish,-and, there-' r ■ foro,. arenot-there for.us to ;find., v : ; "■', : :,:: j ; , ; . This.is something, like, an .outline' of the j •; system of;adaptation by. survival, of the. fit-. s ;'. test, .by -the struggle for existence, or, : as' 0 ! Darwin said, by:natural.selection, "-.'Why :ho .'.; ■ called, it especially/naturalselection, I":must, V : > if necessary,; show further, next time; and it ';' I must also be;at some: : other timeVthat we. ~ -. consider aud criticise, that distinction which' ■; 1. seems to. be in Aristotle's..words.: arid .those :. ■; of later;naturalists between s a moulding .pur- ; pose and an. inward, ; outward "thrusting . -. spontaneity.•': We.oan'only it , is a ■.'• i .contrast'(.-or .':divorce which is I invalid" for; , ! Christian •philosophers,"and I ;think;' fpr. all. ■? - other) modern■ philosophers. ;\But iri. ; ".this. ; ; view, we .owe , something' to the of, j 1 Darwin's teaching itself, 'and so it. must" { v engage bur attention, later; "• Looking, back,, j t' it seems;, to.'me/that /the naturalist wlio.at ~' 3 that; time spoke; most philosophically/was. ■* i Richard Owen,y a'man neglected now,- and j 3 strangely ;'misunderstbpd'.vt.-am; inclined '..'to, i. think,, even ■] 1 elements/in the caserwhich.'E-eyerlp.pk;;. 'V^;;:;' >"• .'::';•..'..';"■; :'.' : - ■:'■' Owen's Axiom./ ; .; i : j [• :■; Certainly .to .a',-'modern ..Christian':'Evohi- , 1 i' : tionist and Darwinian there would be.-noth- i f ing unwelcome .in Owenls "axiom of.thexon-. ; , tinuous operation: of creative, power/'or-'of- i i'. the ordained becoming of liyiiig- , things." He_ S :■ says further'of:certain'..phenomena , 'tha V.'the.v .< . "shake our- confidence , ' inftKe'co'nclusion-thaf . the Apteryx; of ."New Zealand' 1 S'rid;. the -'Red' .- _. Grouse of JEnglahd 'wereT. distinct creations .in ': andfOr thpsoisknds. respectively.'. 1 :■! [-.'■'', . j. ;.■::'.Yet'on' accpiint.of-these statements, Darj win "included.:.- Professor .Owen/ with; other i i , Palaeontologists as being'.firmly cdnyinced of i J- , . the , immutability._6f species," and he'reports. ;'i . .his.'strange conclusibn with;a.naive"expres.-; i .: siori of surprisevat'leaniing thaVhis.:.opiniot) i of, Owen ..was 'mistaken,' '•'Our jsurpnse , ' Trill'' j !.• rather be'that he could'have'made :the 'mis-'! '1 «■ >ke;';;-.: :.■:; C :: , .; Darwin taught/^olution'i''lVdesMn(i'r;:.%i{h : ' k modificatipri, and.in.."this; ! hoihad'many',"Sßut. :■ V? noiV^many.Wsiiccossfuli^predeceßSofjs. / '\:';He; ' '"■ taught .natural.;selection,' ;that ris'the;'gu'id-- - , ance:. of evolution, not by.'the' '• of-the conditions of. lifei".but: by;, their-'seleiir. : . . tive effect;'that is -,the,elimination of-those-.' g- mdividuals-::which v 'were iri ; .fany: : ' ? .favourably differentiated, , ! :and '-the: survival'" > j. of itlie'-fittestj'Vtlat'iisj-thto'/iiutTiyal-W'SEySjf::' ' g., test;to'survive.-.Y/ : : . ; ■•..;'V; i ;;'; i '-"-' ,■-.'>-, s< 'i^''^'.'. ':'

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090206.2.81

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 425, 6 February 1909, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,752

DARWIN CENTENARY. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 425, 6 February 1909, Page 7

DARWIN CENTENARY. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 425, 6 February 1909, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert