SUPREME COURT.
CLAIM FOII RETURN OF A DEPOSIT: The'case of Fleming Ross v. Michael Frain was partly heard before Mr/Justico OhapmaH : yesterday. • • . Mr; 8011, K.C. (with him Mr. Lovvy), appeared on behalf of tho plaintiff, and Mr. Skerrott, K.C!. (with him Mr. ; Von Haast), for tho dofondant. This was an action to recover £100, being a deposit lodged by plaintiff with defendant' as security for 0110 Martinson for tho fulfilment, of a contract in rospect to certain additions to Parliament House, and for damages for allogc'd refusal by defendant to permit plaintiff to complete tho contract with Martinson in respect of which tho doposit had been lodged as security. : Tho taking of evidenco had not concluded 'whon, tho Court adjourned until 10.45 this morning. . - QUESTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. Mr. Justice* Cooper yesterday hoard further ovidence and argument with referenco to the Wanganui caso of W. Mitchell versus F. A. Harkiiess, a suit for an injunction to restrain defendant from obstructing a-right-of-way •by building upon it. His Honour reserved his decision. Mr.- G. Hutchison appeared for plaintiff, aiid; Mr.; Myers for deiendant. : < ■ '■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080731.2.25
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 264, 31 July 1908, Page 4
Word Count
180SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 264, 31 July 1908, Page 4
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in