QUESTION OF COMMITTAL.
TRIVIAL CASES. (BY TELEGRAPH.— PRESS ASSOCIATION.) Auckland, June 26. In the course of a case at the Police Court, Mr. Napier, one of tho defending counsel, urged tho triviality of the theft in question as a reason why the case should not be sent to tho Supremo Court, and putting the country to a heavy expenso, when justioo, he argued, could bo equally well applied under the circumstances at tho hands of tho Justices., Sub-Inspector Gordon contended, however, that tho public security demanded that an oircnco should be dealt with, not according to the value of damage dono or goods stolen, but with regard to tho circumstances con-' periling it-. When a servant violated a position of triist, ho merited a heavy penalty, irrespective of what amount' was involved. ' Tho presiding Justice, while agreeing with Mr. Napier that what appeared to bo trivial cases were frequently and, in his opinion unnecessarily taken to tho higher court, said that in tho case in question tho Bench had no option but to commit.
The old and woll-known Orp.irlnnl.il tfolol, situated at tho cornor of Lrunbton Qunv and' Johnston Street, Is being advertised for sals bj jMuwanJoi removal.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080627.2.41
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 235, 27 June 1908, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
198QUESTION OF COMMITTAL. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 235, 27 June 1908, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.