SUPREME COURT.
'IN CHAMBERS. _ His •• Honour: Mr. ,'Justico Chapman held a - -' •sitting' in; Chambers' yesterday-' morning.. : . PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION. -. Orders; for probate in the ostates of de- •;, '/parsons : were . granted- as; follow: — ■ •William 11010, J. Furze, AV. J. Evans, T. • G. Cany I. Plimmer, John Hallulay, and " E. A. -Graham..: Orders for administration— C. Duffy aud J. Crawford. J A' COMPLICATED PROCEDURE : V Mri;;Skerrett^K.C., madoi application for, an -granting.. to '.'/take' , evidence- , bearing ,on a caso (Knauor v. ■Lauennan) ■ beforethe Courts at Dotmold, m Germany, :of:', resident'.'iii Wellington; :.'.- ; - \ It .was v.osplained' that 1 before this par- ■ ticularj-oviclence could bo take)), it would . ■; be . necessary to 'obtain an order from the . Court-,:i 'and -forward the , ,sauio' •; to ■>; - the : Colonial, Office at London. From there tho document be ihnnded-'on- to ithe German.'Ambassador, and t thonco: to tho Ger- , man Consul.iat' Welling't-on. The order, was granted,- tho : question- of -costs- being re;:V; : :^ServiKlif,K '' 7 '-V^T'' "'T '^ GEORGETTI v. ( GEORGEITI , Application was made by Mr. Martin r Chappiaiv IC.C., 'on "behalf of tlio petitioner • :• in re;."the divorce case. Georgotti v. Geor- : ■; gcttij ■ for leavo to issue a commission to < • take tho evidence of .several witnesses - m . 'England, on tlio grounds ( that such evidence .: was necessary'for. tlio'pilrpose of petitioner's ■:Mr. Myers, for tho respondent, asked that :■' the . order .be over pending the. arrival ;-r - ln Now Zealand of his client, who was. o.\- • peoted'almost any day. . In. support,r counsel stated that, the - evidence sought tn be ob- : taiiled 'in r'-Eiigland : was .'refdrablo jfrmcipallj: 1 cprtiiiii rallegatipiis ; in aineniled: pbtir ; -tion-filed'•by-:'petiti6nervduring rcspoijdentls l absence frojji New 'Zealand;/ :lhe Court had already^ : dr'deredVthfitffcspp*ndeht'slmu ... ' until >May Ito file an anssver. to the peti- i '■ . .'.His Honour hold that a divorce petition i , was different'from an "ordinary; petition;'-and • Tinder< tho ' circumstances it -would/be iieces- , ~ . Bary !for,the. evidence to bo taken.: /Ho did , not ; that , ; hO : could; .delay. tho ' actiial making of 'the. ordorj-vwhich, however,• need ; - I :not tAteessarily• ; lie. issued'■ immediately. :'.: : ". i:Mr; j.Myers .suggested that this prqcedurei,, ,".in'-effect;' amounted .'to the same thing, 'and'; urgetl.that the making, of the order..stand■ over /until the arrival: of .his client.-.This
"was opposed by counsel 1 for the petitioner. His said'Ttliat -rfcspondont; should - s »l;.be'; givetf; an^opportunity*of cpn3idoring>;tnq matter,; and,- if necessary, sending mstnictionsi'to England. l The- order uould be granted, but it would not bo used until . '•' 30;diiys'ftpg;|atpi;icM9pt : : .= of' • ; : %■'' Referring' l .to ; tho ; question of .?.■ costs, .. ho \ ! inquire as. ; to ; Wat. was'.a. proper, suni: to: be paid,, pr ' y ••'iecured'.to cover :the'tcos^vbf ;^9' ; j":>ndi of 'i executing the:sam3. : . rs to. fwliethpr this sura or any part of, it ; SMiired'....by.; bond,' or paid- into •« OourV' 'or paid: to the wife, would bo re-; . served, i The -Registrar." would.afford/ 4!') dent^^-'reasonable r ;"ppportunity'"of :\beiiig ■■■■■■■, hoard, on 1 -the question of. the amount. : ROSENBERG v. ROSENBERG ■■'}U^•Ah'tSrder,;-f.or; payment',; of in 'the"diyr' ':-y ■ orce caso Roso'nberg v. Rosenberg.'. ' '• ; FITZHERBERT v. ■ V/ATERHOUSE. V Mr.i-'Siyers moved for directions as to the i servico'of originating., summons in tlio case, Fitzherbert v. "Waterliouse. ■ Counsel e.\plain'ed'ij.lhat;: plaintiff's/ solicitors' were act- . ing';ibrv'both'; parties, and. appointing xounieb to represent separate interests. .His Hon•'•our directed that. theKservice bodispensedwith 1- ! |Av:/'V ! : ''• M'ELDOWNEY y. THOMPSON. 'Sir '-Kenneth Douglas, ' for tho plaintiff, moved;for an order for ".'interrogatories.-" 'She prder: : .waS:' : made, 'dbferidaht ■ to repfy-to;tho interrogatories, and to state ••"if tho , 'Camendcd--statemcn^f ! of=sicfehce :t, irii-.; swored any of ithem. The question of costs, £2 25., was reserved. f . - .. ...
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080321.2.131
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 152, 21 March 1908, Page 15
Word Count
560SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 152, 21 March 1908, Page 15
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.