BLASPHEMY.
, Sir,—l desire to thank you for the article m to-day s issuo about tho prosecution at Homo for blasphemy. Tho languago ono now hoars, with reference...to the Deity, especially tho Lord Christ, is piost revolting, and I think ought to bo repressed without any ceremony. I do not pretend'. to dictate what ought to be regarded as blasphemy, but people's religious feelings ought to' bo respected, and when I hear such talk I feel groatly annoyed, because physically I «m not able to arguo with these offensive persons iir the only. wny. they take any notice of May you go on and prosper.-—I am, etc., - appreciative! Lowor Hiitt, February 12.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080213.2.95.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 120, 13 February 1908, Page 9
Word count
Tapeke kupu
111BLASPHEMY. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 120, 13 February 1908, Page 9
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in