Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IN REPLY.

To the E'Utor oj the Cromwell Abc.ck. Sik.~ As Secretary of the Bannockburn and i Garrick Range Miners’ Association, I cannot let i the remarks of Messrs Fmer, Smythies, ami ; others, at the meeting held in Cromwell on Thursday night, pass unnoticed. It being tl o • aluty of the Secretary of a new branch to notify : its formation to cither Associations, I may be ! considered blameworthy for not acquainting i Mr Smytliies w.th the fact of the formation of : th ; Bannockburn and Carrick Range Association. ; However, my reason fur not doing so was that I I (with numerous others) consider there never baa b en un il now a properly-formed Association jin Cromwell. The impression I have been under i is that what was done at the time of the Coufe* i rence at Tuapeka was merelv for the purpose of ! electing a delegate, and raising funds to pay his j expenses. I paid the subscription at that time ; an I voted, but never thought, until the occasion ; of the late meeting in Cromwell, that I belonged | to a Crom veil Miners’ Association, or that there I was any such Association in existence. Possi ]y [ there has been, hut if so surely a more useless ; b idy could not exist. Nearly four months have . elapse I since it was formed, and there has never ; licet) a meeting of members, nor a committee and ; olliceis elected—or else how comes it that these were elected on Thursday? Mr Fraer said he ; thought snne blame was attachable to certain members for starting a branch at the Bannock* i burn without in anyway consulting the Cromwell one, and that he thought the establishment of i he Bannockburn Association a decided, mistake. | As to toe lirst remark, seeing that it atfects my* : se.f, I can only reassert my ignorance of the i existence of such a body ; while, if it did exisL ! t has never done anything worthy of taking hj i pattern from, or anything to encourage adhesion ' -.o its members ’ list In regard to the formation : d our branch being a mistake, no one on this j side the Kawarau, at any rate, will agree with ! such an opinion, for it is altogether too far to : t' aval into Cromwell to a mating; indeed, no ion 3 .would do it Moreover, I ennsi ler there is j plenty of room for two Associations : let. (,'ro n- ' well have- say)-Bendigo, Q larU.Rcef Point, the Gorge, Lowburu, Jtc. ;’an I Jlaamockurn the Car* i kk Range, Nevis, and so forth, in their d strict, i 1 need say no more, except to wish the Cromwell ! Association every success. -I am, &c., John Fenwick. j March 25, IS7J. Sec. B. &O.U.M. A.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CROMARG18730401.2.10.4

Bibliographic details

Cromwell Argus, Volume IV, Issue 177, 1 April 1873, Page 5

Word Count
458

IN REPLY. Cromwell Argus, Volume IV, Issue 177, 1 April 1873, Page 5

IN REPLY. Cromwell Argus, Volume IV, Issue 177, 1 April 1873, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert