Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WIFE-BEATING ILLEGAL

Press Association)

i House Discusses Remarks Of Magistrate

(Per

WELLINGTON, Sept. 21. A magistrate 's reeent comments on wit'e-beating, found an ending in the House of Representatives today. Mr Mason,.answering Mr Sutherland, said his attention had been drawn to the report of the remarks of a magistrate at Kaitaia on the subjeet. Mr Mason said: "It has been stated by the hiehest authority that it has never been

the law in England — and it eertainly has never been the law in tKis conntry — that a man may beat his wife. I feel sure our Courts would fully uphold that view. No amendment to the law is con- ' sidered necessary. Mrs G. H. Ross (Hamilton) remarking on Mr Mason's reply to Mr Sutherland, said that the answer of the- Minister was satisfactory so far as the • law in Britain and in this country went" but faeetious as the remarks of the Magistrate might have been, further cases of wife beating ^iad occurred. She thought that the women- of the country had an apology due to them by the Magistrate. Mr Fraser, supporting the member for Hamilton, said that the Magistrate '.s remarks were a shoek to everyone. Those remarks might be under' Jstandable if there were any foundation in law for them. The old sayings thal punishment was dealt out ' ' more in love thon in anger" and "it hurts mcmore than it does you," no longer ob tained. Remarks from the Bench were taken more seriously and it seemed to him that things went strangely astray. There had been further wife beating cases and altogether the Magistrate 's statement was most regrettable. Mr Gorbett. The Magistrate in New Plymouth thought differently and acted so last week. Mr Sullivan: We ought to give the wife the privilege of beating her husband. Mr Fraser said that wife beating might have been founded on the old proverb — ' ' something about a woman and a dog and a walnut tree, the more you beat them the better they'll be," — but that was not the law and was not sense. The feeling among the people g, which had been created by the Magistrate 's remarks, was, what was wrong1 with the law?

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19490922.2.49

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 22 September 1949, Page 9

Word Count
367

WIFE-BEATING ILLEGAL Chronicle (Levin), 22 September 1949, Page 9

WIFE-BEATING ILLEGAL Chronicle (Levin), 22 September 1949, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert