Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

[?' [?] [?] Of Watersiders

' AUCKLAND; August 3. The eonelusion of the Waterside £mployers' Assoeiation's case was in nght when the Tribunal ixiquiring into the Mountpark and Broompark disputes adjourned this afternoon. Mr. C. A. Hamer told the Tribunal that he uxpeeted .to finish by noon tomorrow. It is likely that Mr. G. G. G. Watson, for the Waterfront Industry Commissio'n, will then address the Tribunal. The major witness today was Captain J. M. Henderson, 'niaster of theBroompark. He said he-had been in the ship as inate and later as niaster, sinee she was'built in 1942, and had had no trouble over her hatehes in any of the 45 ports she had visited in various parts of tho world. Captain Henderson said that until the Broompark 's prcsent Auckland visit, there had never been any objection -to nianhandling her hatehes. In all his time. at sea .»he had never heard a word against this praeliee. Slinging was a morc dangerous nrethod. "Moving hatehes by hand is the only method I have ever seen uscd," said witness. "I have never seen an accident and I do not know why the inen did not earry on hcre. I do not think the hatehes aro too heavy. lt sceiiis fantastie that a crane or derrick should have to earry eaeh oue off individually. ' ' To Mr. T. P. Cleary, for the Cornmission, witness said the hatehes were a vulnerable part of a ship and a wcakness eould lead to aeeidents, even to the loss of a vessel at soa. This was reeognised as a . frequent eause of the loss of sliips. He eould recall four vessels lost with all liands in the North Atlantie, after sending messages that their hatehes were stove in. As a sliipmaster -he wo.uld' not lightly agree to any material alteration in his hatehes. To Mr. Barnes witness said moving hatehes by hand was the most ecpnotnieal method from the viewpoint ot stevedoring. Time lost moving them by sling was elumsy and uneeonomieal. "Asked if he agreed that a large proportion of aeeidents to workcrs were eaused through faultv hatehes, witness said he had never been in a ship with faulty hatehes and had never seen an aeeident as the result of oue. "Plaees like Auckland would impose their wavs on the whole world," said witness wlien asked by Mr. Barnes to eomment 011 the Marine Department's proposals to introduee slab hatehes. " Companies regularly running between here and Britain may find* them suitable but wliy should an oeeasional visitor to Auekland be penaiised just for thosc ships? As I do not approve of slab- hatehes on my own ship, I suggest you approaeh the

Sliipowners' Associatiohs of the maritiiiie nations." : Witness added, under fnrther .crossexamination, that he had not seen a ship with slab hatehes but he1 eould visualise them. -

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19480804.2.8.1

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 4 August 1948, Page 3

Word Count
467

[?' [?] [?] Of Watersiders Chronicle (Levin), 4 August 1948, Page 3

[?' [?] [?] Of Watersiders Chronicle (Levin), 4 August 1948, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert