Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TERMS SAID TO REPRESENT A COMPLETE CAPITULATION BY GOVERNMENT

— Press Assoeiation •

By Telegraph

WELLINGTON, February 14. i While he had learned unG'fhcially the terms of the agreemeut between the Minister of Labour and the Waterside ! Union Exeeutive! the" inf'ormation was still confidential and j he was nbt at liberty to disclose it, said Mr. "K. A. Belford, I the employers' representative on the Waterfront Industry ! Comm'ission, today. It was suffieient to say, however, that the , Waterside Union lea-ders were dlpi^ted at the outeome. In Mr. Belford's o.pinioh the terniAof the settlement repfe- ! sented a comp'lete capitulation by the Government to the i union, and was just an other instance, although protoably the « ' most flagrant on'record, of the jungle law that "might is ! right" in the present industrial set-up in this country. i . It was incredible to him that the decision of a Commis- | sion set up by the Government, and presided over hy a^ Judge ; of the Supreme Court, could be disregarded by a Minister of • v ] the Crown, who, in a secret conc'lave with union representaj tives, arrived at an agreement without any consultation with I the Commission, or as far as he kn-ew with the employers. ! That the agreement might cost the employers or the com- ; munitv another £100,000 or so a year while the existing slackj ness and wastage of labour on the waterfront remained uni challenged was perhaps beside the point, the vital factor being that here was a case decided by a Jud'ge after hearing both sides, rejec'ted by one of the litigants and rejudged and rodecided by a Minister after hearing only one side. As far as he could see the Minister had no power under the regulations to implement the agreement or cancel the ; Judge's decision, and while he, Mr. Belford, was a member of the Commission — and he had no intention of resigninghe would not agree to the Miinster's agreement with the ; union being implernented by the Commission.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19470214.2.27.1

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 14 February 1947, Page 5

Word Count
326

TERMS SAID TO REPRESENT A COMPLETE CAPITULATION BY GOVERNMENT Chronicle (Levin), 14 February 1947, Page 5

TERMS SAID TO REPRESENT A COMPLETE CAPITULATION BY GOVERNMENT Chronicle (Levin), 14 February 1947, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert