Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEVIN PARTIES IN PROPERTY DISPUTE

A case which commenced in the Supreme Court, Palmerston North, on Friday last, took an un expected turn when Mr. Justice Johnson, without hearing the evidence, adjourned .the, case for a short time and expres'sed the opinion that the defendant should make a reasonable settlement. The proceedings, which were brought by Mrs. M. F. Upton, of Hokio Beach, who was represented by Mr. 'N. M. Thomson, of Levin, against W. H. Walker, of Levin, represented by Mr. H. R. Cooper, of Palmerston North, concerned the purchase in 1942 by Mrs. Upton from Mr. Walker of a Native leasehold section at Hokio on which was erected a cottage and shed. In outlining the case for Mrs> Upton, Mr. Thomson explained that she purchased Walker's lease of the property believing statements by him that the buildings would be hers, and could be removed by her at any time before the expiration of the lease in 1946. Subsequently Mrs. Upton discovered that not only did the buildings belong to, the Maori Land Board, 1 but also that she was now under a substantial liability to put them into repair and hand them back to, fche board ±n good repair, order and ; condition. She, therefore, asked1 the court for relief, and for a rescis- 1 sion of the contract on the grounds of misrepresentation by Walker. ; At this stage His Honour remark-i ed to Mr. Cooper that it did seemi to him that Mrs. Upton was at leasti entitled to. be relieved from liability for repair, especially as she did not seem to have any independent legal advice before buying the lease. He could not, of course, decide the case without hearing the evidence, ■ and was not at that stage making any assumption one way or another. He did fhink, however, that it was a case. of hardship for Mrs. Upton and suggested that Mr. Cooper should ddvise his client to. meet Mrs. Upton at least on the question of liability for repair of. the buildings. The case was then adjourned to enable counsel and the parties to confer, and it was later announced that a satisfactory settlement had been reached.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19470212.2.13

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 12 February 1947, Page 4

Word Count
362

LEVIN PARTIES IN PROPERTY DISPUTE Chronicle (Levin), 12 February 1947, Page 4

LEVIN PARTIES IN PROPERTY DISPUTE Chronicle (Levin), 12 February 1947, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert