Counsel Defends Goering at Nuremberg
Press Assn.
HESS' COUNSEL REBUKED
By Telegraph
-Copynght ;
Reeeived Saturday, 11 a.m. NURRMBERG, July 5. Goering, although nominally Hitler's second-in-command, had no special powers except in Hitler's absence from the Reich, said his counsel, Dr. Otto Stahmer, before the War Crimes Tribunal. Goering could neithe'r rescind, change nor supplement Hitler's orders. Dr. Stahmer claimed that Goering's infiuence was responsible for the Munich Pact. If Goering had gone further in his work for pe.ace he v/as risking a charge of high treason. He by-passed the Foreign G'A.ce, and tried to reach agreement ; v>\ ^Britain through the Sv/edisli j int fmediary, Dahlerus. The presiding judge, Lord Justice | Lawrence, twice rebnked Dr. Seidl, j counsel for Hess, within the first j three minutes of his final address i for not submitting his speech for j translation, and for arguing that t the Treaty of Versailles was unjust. I Later Lord Justice Lawrence re- ! fused to hear Dr. Seidl any more j uniil lie recast the speech in conformity with his ruling that the ; Versailles Treaty was irrevelant to I the indictment. i
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19460706.2.16.1
Bibliographic details
Chronicle (Levin), 6 July 1946, Page 5
Word Count
184Counsel Defends Goering at Nuremberg Chronicle (Levin), 6 July 1946, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Chronicle (Levin). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.