Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CATCHMENT RATING

-Press. Association

Beards.Urge Uniform Charge - of Gne Farthing FIRST DOMINION CONFERENCE

By "Telegraph-

WELLINGTON, May 21. Proposals to introduce a limited. uniform general rate of i-d in the £1 on the capital value was discussed at the flrst big Dominion confer-* ence of the New Zealand Catchment Board this morning. Some dele- ! gates objected to the fact that [legislation would limit the rate to\ ! six years, and would require boards •to make a land classification "duriing that psriod. ! As contemplated in the legislal tion, the rate would be only a tem- ! porary measure, said Mr. J. R. Hair, 'of Poverty Bay.v Boards should have permanency to enable them to i carry out the work without the hindrance of a break. The public fooked on boards as glorifxed river boards, but_ this was only part of the boards' jobs, said Mr." J". T. Heatheley, Manawatu , 'River and Soil Conservation Council. probably the most important side of their work as conservation would affect the whole community. He felt a small general rate was best and fairest. i Dr. P. R. Woodhouse, of South Canterbury, said a small general I rate was favoured, but there should ;be limitations on the way the money was spent. The six-year limitation proposed by the Govern.ment while classifications were be- | ipg done was unfortunate, and counties could not be blamed for objection to an unrestricted flat rate. He suggested that within the farthing rate a minor works and t plant rate of one-sixteenth of^ a penny each be permitted. ] Hawke's Bay opposed a general ; rate, said Mr. C. Lassen. Boards would not be bound to raise the full farthing, said Mr. J. Dennis, of Southland. _His board proposed a levy of one-sixteenth. i The conference decided to ask • the Government to proceed with. ; legislation for a farthing rate.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19460521.2.13

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 21 May 1946, Page 4

Word Count
303

CATCHMENT RATING Chronicle (Levin), 21 May 1946, Page 4

CATCHMENT RATING Chronicle (Levin), 21 May 1946, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert