Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Dust Speck Won Game

How a speck of dust in a recent t'ours tourney in the South decided* the result on oue end has been referred to by one of the skips, S. Purdy, of Carl- | ton. The two skips had eaeh played one bowl which came to. rest on either side of the jack, both apparently touching. The thirds agreed -that-.the shofs were touchers and that the end wquljl have to be replayed, but it was decided to call in an iimpire. The, situation was closely inspected f rqrq all angles by an official, who ruled .that a speck oi; dirt or grit separated pne of the bowls- fiom the jack.' Thus, bv an uu"usually small measure, oue bowl was ruled out and the other too'k the shot.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHRONL19460309.2.8

Bibliographic details

Chronicle (Levin), 9 March 1946, Page 3

Word Count
129

Dust Speck Won Game Chronicle (Levin), 9 March 1946, Page 3

Dust Speck Won Game Chronicle (Levin), 9 March 1946, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert