Defence

Press, 13 February 1986, Page 20

Defence

Sir,—R. Thompson (February 11) sees the law of the jungle prevailing — “the strong constantly preying on the weak.” I would agree to some extent, but would add that one of the main ways of preying used by the super-Powers, and in particular the United States, is conjuring up bogymen to fear, so we can then be assured of protection from the manufactured fear. New Zealand’s isolation and terrain are in themselves our main defence. Just who, in reality, are our enemies? Who has acted in a threatening way towards us? Who do we really need to fear? “Fear” itself? I would agree wholeheartedly with John Brand when he says New Zealand now has the opportunity to give the world an urgently-awaited lead in how to conduct sane international relationships based on our common humanity, rather than threats of mutual annihilations. — Yours, etc., JILL WILCOX. February 11, 1986.

Sir, — Can R. Thompson tell us how New Zealand can be defended? I suggest that the correspondent looks at an atlas, and studies the New Zealand coastline. How is this to be defended, or for that matter, how is it to be invaded? By whom is it

likely to be invaded? The most likely candidate for that honour is a “friend.” The insidious takeover from within which has occurred in Britain — the wolf in sheep’s clothing who defends us by establishing bases which become isolated areas exclusive to the occupying power. The intrusion into internal politics, with not-so-subtle pressures, such as we have seen over the antinuclear debate. Power to the Government’s elbow. May the Ministry of Disarmament flourish, and let us get on with antinuclear living. I would prefer it to seeing my grandchildren rot with nuclear-induced disease. — Yours, etc., Mrs A. J. FLANAGAN. February 11, 1986.