Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Tarty’ finds no note of Rakiura deal

PA Auckland A mystery “third party” has told the Reserve Bank it has no record of any commitment to help Rakiura Holdings pay for its abortive $lOO million Government stock tender bid.

Reports have suggested that Rakiura’s Mr Brian Alexander told the bank by letter that the bid was made on behalf of a principal, the “Auckland Star” said yesterday. It was also suggested he named the institution concerned and explained he made the deal with one of its officers, who had since left.

A request from the “Auckland Star” for a copy of this letter, made under the Official In-

formation Act, has been refused.

However, the bank says “... the letter sets out certain claims that Rakiura had made oral funding arrangements with a third party which fell through after (Rakiura’s) tender had been accepted.

“The bank has had discussions with the third party which claims that it had no record of any commitment to Rakiura. In view of that fact, the bank is not prepared to release the letter.”

The letter’s reference to "funding arrangements” rather than a deal between an agent and principal, may mean Rakiura was intending to buy the stock itself.-

While the third party

may have “no record of any commitment to Rakiura” this does not necessarily mean no deal was ever made. Mr Alexander’s letter talked of “oral funding arrangements.” Besides wanting to protect the privacy of the third party the bank gave two other reasons for declining the request by the “Star” for a copy of the letter:. • ■

• So as not to prejudice the future supply of similar information from tender participants.

• So as not to inhibit the bank’s commercial activities. A bank official said the Reserve Bank was still looking at what legal action it might take over the Rakiura affair.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19860129.2.67

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, 29 January 1986, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
307

Tarty’ finds no note of Rakiura deal Press, 29 January 1986, Page 8

Tarty’ finds no note of Rakiura deal Press, 29 January 1986, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert