Allegation retracted
The allegation that the Canterbury Cleaners’ Union was applying pressure to security guards through other unions was withdrawn yesterday by Mr Bob House. Mr House, the security guard who wrote to the Prime Minister a week ago complaining about being forced into a strike without a right to vote, joined many other security officers in Christchurch yesterday — the day of the strike — at work. At his Hornby workplace yesterday he said that he wished to retract a statement made earlier that his union was putting pressure on him and his supporters to comply, by involving other unions. The secretaries of both the Canterbury, Marlborough and Westland Cleaners, Caretakers, Lift Attendants and Watchmen’s Union and the Canterbury Drivers’ Union, which had
been named by Mr House, denied any attempt to apply pressure. Mr House said that he had based his fears on “supposition” after a telephone call from persons he declined to name. A meeting on June 8 of contract cleaners and security guards voted to strike yesterday and the last Friday each month in support of the Federation of Labour claim for a $2O-a-week wage rise, but many security guards claimed that they had not been told of the meeting. They held thenown meeting, and voted not to join the strike yesterday. Most security guards who are members of the union were on duty yesterday, according to the management of Securitas and Armourguard. A third company, Crown Watching and Commercial Services, Ltd, declined to comment on the
effect of the strike.
The secretary of the Cleaners’ Union, Mr Gavin Cumming, said that he did not know how effective the strike had been because cleaners generally worked late and he had no way of knowing how many had reported or would report for work.
Mr House said he conceded that there might have been a human error in the union’s not informing many security guards of the meeting of June 8. If it was an error “it should not be repeated too often,” he said. He hoped that the planned meeting of security guards with union officials present would be able to sort out the issue.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830625.2.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, 25 June 1983, Page 1
Word count
Tapeke kupu
357Allegation retracted Press, 25 June 1983, Page 1
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in