Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The homeless

Sir,—How heartening to hear the Catholic bishops speaking out against the status quo and pleading for the needs of the homeless in our society (“The Press,” June 23). For far too long churches have taken the safe option and have often been themselves only safe harbours for the affluent. Christ aligned himself with the poor and oppressed and only by similar alignment can the present churches give witness in the modern world. We continually hear stories of the misery of homeless families; we know that many live in substandard conditions and that others are forced to stay in motor-camps because they cannot afford the initial bond on rental accommodation. We all know these things, yet we are continually told by those in authority that “there is no crisis.” When one is well fed and well housed oneself there is certainly no personal threat. That the crisis is there is only too apparent. — Yours, etc., JILL WILCOX. June 23, 1983.

Sir,—Mr Catanach of the Housing Corporation assures us that the evidence gathered in the homelessness survey notwithstanding, Christchurch people are adequately housed and this city has no housing shortage. This is good news for the families we know who are trying to make a home in motor camps, or coping with the stress and indignity of hopelessly overcrowded flats, or depending on the charity of relations for a roof over their heads: perhaps an answer to their housing needs is closer than they, or we, have been led to believe? At present they are caught in a dilemma: they either put up with desperately unsatisfactory temporary conditions, or if they can find, and afford, something a little better, they pay the price of dropping even further down the Housing Corporation’s priority list. How does the Housing Corporation define “adequacy” and is this definition adequate? — Yours, etc., TRISH CONSEDINE,

MARION DELPRADO,

MARGARET GRENFELL, JENNY GUNBY, HELEN KNOWLES, MARIE McCREA, JACKIE RIMINTON, MARINA BALL, Catholic Social Services. June 23, 1983.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830625.2.108.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, 25 June 1983, Page 16

Word count
Tapeke kupu
329

The homeless Press, 25 June 1983, Page 16

The homeless Press, 25 June 1983, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert