Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Strindberg’s ‘Miss Julie’

“Miss Jolie,” by August Strindberg, directed by Julie Brown for the Common Theatre Troupe. Presented at the Peterborough Centre. From June 23. Running time: 8.15 p.m. to 9.45 p.m. Reviewed by John Farnsworth.

The Common Theatre Troupe is a company new to Christchurch, using obviously limited resources, they have managed to create simple but effective surroundings for intimate theatre.

In this respect, “Miss Julie” was an eminently suitable first choice, requiring the minimum of technical equipment and, apart from one scene, a tiny cast The only exception to this simplicity was the play’s presentation as a detailed costume drama.

The play itself, because it is a deceptively difficult one to perform successfully, was a brave choice. Although the plot is straightforward enough, the atmosphere and characterisation are both shifting and complex, and require a sureness of touch which was not always present

The play’s dynamics revolve round a single action: the brief liaison of Miss Julie (Kristen Gillespie) and her father’s servant Jean (Bill Direen). But is is the differences in sex and class, as well as their opposing characters which produces both the fluctuating relations of power between them, and the tension in the play. In this production, the characterisation and motives were very clearly

laid out, but often the necessary intensity to propel the drama was absent, largely, however, it is just a matter of extending the obvious Btence of the actors to e the charged emoclimate.

That aside, Bill Direen and Kisten Gillepsie respond well to each other, but need to highlight the alternating magnetism and repulsion between them. Nonetheless, his petty conceits and ambition and her contrariness are ably portrayed. Carol Woodward

gives them solid support as

With more confidence, and deservedly bigger audiences than the meagre five first-nighters, this could become the absorbing production it has the potential to be.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830624.2.40

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, 24 June 1983, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
308

Strindberg’s ‘Miss Julie’ Press, 24 June 1983, Page 4

Strindberg’s ‘Miss Julie’ Press, 24 June 1983, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert