Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Wilson Defends Policy

(N.Z. Press Assn.—Copyright) LONDON, July 25. Mr Harold Wilson tonight defends his controversial wage and price freeze before critics from his own party when he explains his policy to a meeting of Labour Party leaders.

The freeze, announced on Wednesday, is the backbone of an austerity package designed to save the pound and bolster the British economy. The proposal is also under

’■> heavy scrutiny by Britain’s trade union leaders, who have ■ challenged it. ! The economic committee of , the 8.5 million-member Trade ’ Union Congress is to hold a ! meeting on Wednesday to de- • cide whether to recommend l to its members that they go along with Mr Wilson in not seeking a pay rise for a year. ■ Many union leaders, includ- ■ ing the former Minister of Technology, Mr Frank Cousins, head of the Transport and

General Workers’ Union, have bluntly asserted that they will fight the freeze to the end. Many Labour members of Parliament were reported stunned and demoralised by Mr Wilson’s “mini-budget” deflation plan, considering it too conservative and an abandonment of traditional party principles Left-wing members were also opposed to the Government’s intention to abandon the principle of full employ-

ment. Mr Wilson’s crisis measures were expected to put 500,000 people out of work.

Under strict interpretation, the wage freeze woyld eliminate agreements already reached, but not implemented, in pay rises for some 5.5 million workers. Another 500,000 would lose cost-of-living allowances and other benefits.

Some sources said the Prime Minister’s plan would affect 12 million of Britain’s 20-million working force. “If we could get the Government to agree in principle to move away from an indiscriminate veto over all pay increases,” a spokesman for the T.U.C. declared yesterday, “we might be able to hammer something out.” A censure motion against the Labour Government, brought by the Conservative Opposition, will be debated In Parliament tomorrow and Wednesday.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660726.2.154

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31121, 26 July 1966, Page 17

Word count
Tapeke kupu
312

Wilson Defends Policy Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31121, 26 July 1966, Page 17

Wilson Defends Policy Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31121, 26 July 1966, Page 17

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert