Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Tariff Criticism ‘Unfounded’

The amalgamations with the Banks Peninsula and Malvern boards might well have staved off the day when a tariff increase became inevitable, said the secretary of the Electrical Supply Authorities’ Association (Mr A. M. Heir), in a letter received by the Central Canterbury Electric Power Board at its monthly meeting yesterday.

Mr Hair, thanking the board for help given to a subcommittee of the association which is studying the reorganisation of the electrical supply industry, referred to criticism of the board for making a tariff increase from June 1.

The increase has been attacked by the Hornby Residents’ Association, which maintains that consumers in the urban part of the board’s area are paying for concessions given to the amalgamated areas.

Mr Hair said that the subcommittee’s survey had shown that the amalgamations with Banks Peninsula and Malvern had given considerable benefits to all consumers in the old Springs-Ellesmere area. The better service and greater vision now available to all the board’s consumers

I was something which could not be measured in money, but as years went by, would become increasingly apparent.

“It was evident from our investigation that the present increase in tariff was not caused by the amalgamations,” Mr Hair continued. “We are fully aware of rising costs in the electrical supply industry, and these are not restricted to your district “We are aware that a few of your consumers expressed unfounded fears in connexion with your expansion. In spite of your efforts to demonstrate to these few critics their misapprehension of the true position, this ill-advised sniping continues.” Mr Hair said the benefits of the board’s policy would eventually become self-evi-dent, even to the most stubborn of its critics.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660713.2.79

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31110, 13 July 1966, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
284

Tariff Criticism ‘Unfounded’ Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31110, 13 July 1966, Page 9

Tariff Criticism ‘Unfounded’ Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31110, 13 July 1966, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert