Administration In The Universities

Press, Volume CV, Issue 31007, 12 March 1966, Page 14

Administration In The Universities

Administrative development of the University of Canterbury, covered in the report of the registrar (Mr G. G. Turbott) after investigations overseas, is a topic which may be overlooked in preoccupation with building expansion and academic innovation. Mr Turbott’s report is a timely reminder that, by standards elsewhere. New Zealand universities are under-staffed and inadequately equipped in this department. The deficiencies do not arise only from growth; new techniques, new machines, and new services have become essential. Mr Turbott says the start made in Canterbury in using data processing equipment is sound. His full report includes recommendations for development which would lead to the formation of a separate centre for this work. Perhaps the most significant point he raises is the suggestion that more faculty administrators should be appointed. Today teachers at all levels complain that too much of their time is being taken with administration at the expense of their teaching and research. This is unnecessary, inefficient, and uneconomic. Academic departments could be divested of these responsibilities to the advantage of their staff and students. Schools now have considerable clerical help, teaching aids, and other assistance so that teachers can teach. The university vicechancellor (Dr. L. L. Pownall) reported after a trip overseas that an increase in technicians would make New Zealand university teaching more attractive. The same applies to administrative help. There persists in New Zealand academic circles a feeling that administrative development means less for teaching. Financially this may be true; but relief from administrative chores (which are becoming more sophisticated and require specialised attention) would amply compensate for any losses.