Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Jeweller's Window

(Specially written for “The

Press” by

ARNOLD WALL)

rvvss uy nniiubu nnLu; THE EDDY a change happens in a longestablished habit of speech something like and eddy may be observed. Some general tendency is simply reversed.

Having kept an ear on New Zealand speech for 66 years I have noticed some such occurrences. The latest to come under my notice is not more than five years old in my experience.

The general tendency in question concerns the long o, which in certain groups of words is, in the New Zealand speech, in so far as it varies from standard English, avoided and replaced by a short o; this applies, too, to the sound of the long open o spelt as aw or au.

The fact may be expressed by saying that the New Zealander dislikes a long o in a certain group of words. I give 12 examples in alphabetical order: bolster, pronounced bollster; bolt as if spelt bollt; choral (hall etc.), as in coral reef; hydraulic as hydrollic; jolt as jollt; molten as mollten; auction, usually oction in New Zealand; oral (examination) as orral; Rolls (Royce) rhymes with dolls: swollen rhymes with pollen: toll rhyming with doll; and troll (verb) as doll. It is noticeable that the shortening of o occurs often, not always, before 1. But it is also to be observed that the long o is left intact, not shortened, when it is followed by Id. Thus the o is invariably long in hold, old, fold, cold, told and so on. I confess that I can see no reason why we do this.

Can anybody see why the o should be short in bolt and long in bold? The only difference is that t is sharp and d is flat. Of course a sharp consonant is naturally shorter than a flat and there is a gleam of light there.

Now for the eddy. In one small group of words the exact opposite to this shortening tendency is to be observed. It is since about 1960, I think, that I have regularly heard over the air revolve as revoalve and so solve and other combinations of -volve. resolve, etc, similarly goalf for golf. Why do they do it?

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660305.2.102

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CV, Issue 31001, 5 March 1966, Page 12

Word count
Tapeke kupu
373

The Jeweller's Window Press, Volume CV, Issue 31001, 5 March 1966, Page 12

The Jeweller's Window Press, Volume CV, Issue 31001, 5 March 1966, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert