Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Fann Workers’ Wages

Sir, —I support "M.D.J.” in her idea of housing farm workers in the rural townships. It seems sound planning to encourage rural township growth, which makes water and sewerage schemes economical. Badly-needed shopping facilities are encouraged to grow and school busescan be smaller and life becomes more stimulating for the whole rural community. When children leave home, mothers can find employment in hospitals, schools, shops, garages, etc., if they so desire. It would be cheaper for

farmers to supply petrol for travelling and pay higher wages, instead of building, maintaining, and paying rates on extra houses on farms. Government loans directed for housing in this field would create assets which could be sold if the worker wanted to acquire a farm. —Yours, etc., E.H. February 8, 1966.

Sir, —I thoroughly endorse the sentiments of “Had Enough.” We have worked as a married couple for £l3 gross a week for the last two years without a raise from the farmer. For the first three months the farmer charged £2 a week rent on the house that was situated in a township. This-involved a travelling expense that had to be met by myself. On different occasions throughout the year anything up to 10 hours in excess of the 44-hour week have been worked without any extra remuneration. One can imagine how little can be saved on such a low basic wage, coupled with the fact that groceries here in the country are anything, from Id to 6d dearer than in the town. However, let it not be said that all farmers are tarred with the same lowwage, long-hour brush, as there are many who pay in excess of £l6 a week plus many generous “perks” and considerations to the farm workers,—Yours, etc., FARM WORKER. February 6, 1966.

Sir, —I recently worked in the country. After five and a half days, including all day Saturday, I was told by the farmer that the wages were £lO a week, less tax. 1 worked from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m., sometimes to 7 p.m. For three days’ harvesting I did not receive one penny extra. No wonder the farmers cannot get workers to go into the country because they are not prepared to pay decent wages to people who are willing to work. —Yours, etc.. DISGUSTED WORKER. February 7, 1966. [This correspondence may now cease.—Ed., “The Press.”]

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660209.2.108.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CV, Issue 30980, 9 February 1966, Page 12

Word count
Tapeke kupu
395

Fann Workers’ Wages Press, Volume CV, Issue 30980, 9 February 1966, Page 12

Fann Workers’ Wages Press, Volume CV, Issue 30980, 9 February 1966, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert