Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Guaranteed Incomes Plan In U.S.

f NZ. Pre„ Assn— Copyright) WASHINGTON, February 4. A special commission yesterfifly recommended to President Johnson that every American family be guaranteed a minimum annual income of 3000 dollars £1075), the Associated Press reported.

The annual cost of such a plan was said to range from 2 billion dollars to 20 billion dollars, depending on its scope. As many as 35 million Americans could be affected if the wage recommendation was adonted. This was but one of dozens of recommendations of a year-long study by a 14member national commission on technology, automation and economic progress. The group was created by Congress and appointed bypresident Johnson to study

“technological unemployment and related problems.” Many of the commission findings are certain to arouse controversy. Perhaps anticipating this, it said “Today’s more advanced ideas will be commonplace tomorrow.” The guaranteed income idea was labelled worthy of further study in President Johnson’s economic report to Congress last month. Under the plan, the Federal Government would make up the difference between a family’s actual income and a fixed minimum standard. Among the recommendations in the 210-page report were:

The Federal Government should become “employer of last resort” for the hard-core jobless, paying them to work in local hospitals, schools, police departments and other “useful community enterprises.” Every young American ‘Should be offered free educaition for two years After graduation from high school. Students would move on to community colleges or vocational schools.

Social security benefits should be increased and public welfare programmes should

be reformed and made more generous. The Federal Government should set a national model building code and deny certain assistance, such as Federal housing authority mortgages, to communities failing to adopt it.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660205.2.146

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CV, Issue 30977, 5 February 1966, Page 15

Word count
Tapeke kupu
285

Guaranteed Incomes Plan In U.S. Press, Volume CV, Issue 30977, 5 February 1966, Page 15

Guaranteed Incomes Plan In U.S. Press, Volume CV, Issue 30977, 5 February 1966, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert