Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Coin Designs

Sir,—Whoever managed to have our coin designs published before they could advance any further towards minting is a loyal New Zealander indeed. They are crude, inaccurate pictures of poor standard and out-dated style. As an art teacher I often have occasion to discuss examples of good and bad design with my pupils and others. While not many New Zealanders are design-con-scious, it is gratifying to know that they can all recognise rubbish if it is bad enough. The subject matter is so juvenile it is hard to believe their publication is not just a national hoax. Criticism is also directed at their lack of elegance and simplicity, which are so striking in overseas designs. I hope that consideration will be given to redesigning most of the coins, and that the graceful, flowing composition of the Australian

set be used as a guiding standard. —Yours, etc.,

M. J. MACDONALD. February 3, 1966.

Sir, —Are the designers laughing up their sleeves and taking the public for a ride? Before anything worse happens, scrap the lot and start again. I shudder to think what the notes will be like. Surely our beautiful flowerseries stamps are a guide to the standard we are accustomed to. We have to live with these coins, probably for a very long time, so let’s have the best that can be produced. It looks as though the designs had rot been open to competition why not?— Yours, etc., NUMIS. February 2, 1966.

Sir,—The new designs are disgusting, to say the least. We have lovely stamps—we have had the stamp of the year—and we have very good designs on present coins. Why go to all the expense of new designs, when the old ones can be adapted to suit? It is going to cost the country enough as it is to change to decimal currency as it is. What was good enough for my parents and their parents are good enough for me. Are we not proud of our native birds, and of our Maori people, that we have to put Rugby players, musterers and uninteresting scenery on our coins? Being a country resident, 1 have played Rugby, seen musterers, and as an amateur artist have painted many landscapes, but I hardly think these things suit designs on coins.—Yours, etc., J. H. E. SMITH. Ashburton, Feb. 3, 1966.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660205.2.131.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CV, Issue 30977, 5 February 1966, Page 14

Word count
Tapeke kupu
390

Coin Designs Press, Volume CV, Issue 30977, 5 February 1966, Page 14

Coin Designs Press, Volume CV, Issue 30977, 5 February 1966, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert