Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Forbidding Title Hides Lively Entertainment

A rather forbidding title, “Macbeth in Camera,” disguises a lively entertainment which was presented by the Voyage Theatre Company in the Civic Theatre last evening. The entertainment comes, surprisingly perhaps, from a dramatised lecture on the theme that every word in Shakespeare, or any other playwright, will make good sense if it is married to the right action. Part of the fun comes when the four actors in the cast demonstrate the other possibilities: saying the words with magnificent sonority but with ridiculously inappropriate actions: saying the words without any action at all (“letting the beauty of Shakespeare’s language speak for itself”); or saving the words with actions which do not make sense in the over-all action of the play Harold I-ang, leader of the group, explains that “Macbeth in Camera" is based on a debate which actually took place between a certain scholar and the actors we saw last night We must take his word that the scholar was a “literary snob” to whom the relationship between action and the word was a revelation (the scholar presumably being unfamiliar with Hamlet’s instruc-

tions to the players?). The innocence of the literary man was given a charming credibility by David Kelsey’s urbane, cleverly quiet performance, but his intellectual position nearly always seemed a contrived fiction. The two actors (Nicholas Amer and Greville Hallam) acted with the somewhat crude enthusiasm of drama school students, but in this way did illuminate some of the searching experimentation which must go into the preparation of a play. Harold Lang, as the producer, bubbled with the extrovert personality which can inspire the creation of a viable play. A certain stageyness in gesture and movement was the price paid for attempting to recreate the spontaneity of the original debate, but any student of the theatre, and anyone who has any interest in Shakespeare will find “Macbeth in Camera” an arresting, stimulating statement of fundamental truths about the realisation of a dramatist’s intention.

“Macbeth in Camera” will be presented again tonight. The Voyage Theatre Company will also present two other programmes later this week. —P.R.S.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660118.2.126

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume CV, Issue 30961, 18 January 1966, Page 12

Word count
Tapeke kupu
353

Forbidding Title Hides Lively Entertainment Press, Volume CV, Issue 30961, 18 January 1966, Page 12

Forbidding Title Hides Lively Entertainment Press, Volume CV, Issue 30961, 18 January 1966, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert