CASE CHARGE DISPUTE
DEADLOCK REMAINS FIVE-YEAR GUARANTEE ' . REJECTED ■Fruit and vegetable growers and retailers’ representatives met jd Christchurcft yesterday in an endeavour to settle the container charge dispute, but proposals made by the growers were rejected by the retailers and a deadlock remains. The growers have, however, agreed to refrain from selling direct to the public until all retailers have had an opportunity to discuss the offer at a meeting they have called for next Monday. This was reported to a meeting or growers last evening, which received a letter from the Canterbury Fruiterers’ Association stating: “As a gesture that the growers sincerely wish to see the present case charge dispute settled amicably, fairly, and satisfactorily to both sides, may we suggest that you cease street sales, while we are meeting in conciliation in an endeavour to settle this matter.” The offer made to the retailers, as reported to last evening’s meeting of growers, was that the growers were prepared to enter into a five-year agreement to take back all containers. Tne case charges offered for reclama, tion were 5d for apples and 4d for pears and lemons. It was emphasised that the charges on these of 6d and sd. respectively, were made by the Internal Marketing Division, but that the growers would be prepared to take the cases at the price mentioned. A full refund on other containers was agreed on as follows: "seven by seven stone fruit and tomato cases, banana, orange, and pineapple cases, 4d; sec-ond-grade apple cases, suitable for vegetables, 3d; fruit trays, 2d; sacks, 6d; sugar-bags. 3d; 121 b tomato cases, 2d On the last it was agreed that the original charge should be waived if a glut occurred on the market and the growers did not wish to recover their cases. . ... The meeting * asked that it be made clear that it was not desired that the Fruit Federation depot should dominate the distribution of empty cases, but that retailers should be able to make arrangements direct with growers on the basis mentioned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19460613.2.28
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, Volume LXXXII, Issue 24900, 13 June 1946, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
338CASE CHARGE DISPUTE Press, Volume LXXXII, Issue 24900, 13 June 1946, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.