LEGAL ARGUMENT IN WHISKY CASE
(Received March 11, 11.30 p.m.) SYDNEY, March 11. Legal argument began to-day on the question of damages in the whisky action, B. Davis, Ltd. (London) v. Tooth and Company, Ltd., but was not concluded. An application was made to reopen the to enable fresh evidence to be tendered as to the sale value of Watson's whisky. Mr Justice Halse Rogers rejected the application.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19350312.2.103
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21420, 12 March 1935, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
68LEGAL ARGUMENT IN WHISKY CASE Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21420, 12 March 1935, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in