TRAMWAY APPEAL BOARD

Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21416, 7 March 1935, Page 9

TRAMWAY APPEAL BOARD

mt imi'.e of ins m;ess. ;;po;ikinc of hi:; nomination ,h * Trwnway Appeal Board Mr G. !' reported t" bnvo said that * represent the decisions and ■ ■■"- --icrt.ts cA the Tramway Board; •'* would b»' found that those in•ert'j,;* would suit the people who thei*;. if (hat is correct, lie •cili to und(U'nd the duties of an ®PPI-r1 board. and ho indulges in a bit . demagogucism. a thing Labour difliculty in avoiding. *if*/ ore . thr - election five Labour canth f-^ S a manifesto to the effect if they were elected no one would •J* his legal rights. I think Mr ManefPf u ; a3 one of the five. Shortly .*5 * ne election, those same men {ileir worst or their best to de£;ve workers not only of their legal »t « , l heir moral rights; and had t'r» « n for . the stron K sense of jusJ';!* of , a magistrate they would have •*-.. ceded. They were elected on their lv^cn Reeled they ignored i"i,k Plr y, '' i,)n d'd I'jot represent the who elected them. Manning's bit of demagogueism not nt. The duty of a member tfi »?. a P. peil ! bf-ard is to do his best fr iP' e 10 Iho-.appellants, not ,# the intorrsls and decisions TJ<it! or other cm/r-* 1 '" h \ ,n ] s H les ! i nd 10 , "' l! Hie less he re*he" >; lri '" r '" ?,,: either side and tVv'T* ab(iw< cases before vv'fl., t" v, !;:rht ijf fn;-r> him in his '"-psrj'y, the better. —Yours, ... ri ; . _ A.B.