UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY

Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21415, 6 March 1935, Page 7

UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY

, !iK euwoa or ran »v.*,s. *tf Mr Bromley wa.-> speaking rivate individual, he was enH * f-press the opinions he did. S* as a member of >' * Board, he was S* rult oT hi s turn. Tariff walls 2: * dfced - the - v „ will add Suities. They will raise is ojr a values and encourage increase dependence of on industry. It Cf of tariff wall? that tne s ufVin the condition it i.-. VP rr.ust get away truin Ihe Bes#, l Th;«t was I'll'- talk. Wo I | } ,(-!i v.itli 'iif economists: f>,f '*«■»'havf' 10 uho «o \v-'l informed. and who E * f *t m'U*- 1IM " tan,r w; '" s ' ; 5 -" i, r .' ; .h,:-!t Britain and quotas. H ' Vie done no irood for Britain. placed on bacon, and r- 5 , ,hp once of bacon. That in*fr.ht cc-t « ' i.v;«m t.. the workr: sfi <"' r i the price paid to <*"• 'b U'j 'io received higher meant Brirfiis less oacon and pay,t Q■ I!te a gooa thing for " but rotten for Britain! If '*>-5 have improved in Britain it of quotas and not because "ojV-'hm:: i»> Mr Bromley's " ° tic-' I'.ut a:v imder-impofl-|fe -. T 4- not tni|>or!.!!R 'mkxls to tin: .C f -f the U'M.u. arc exporting I"-;' have unemployment and the " f , arc! n.nir-.-.- that «•> with r.'. 'n ' should know that ryl< re romm:; in in : r .,e .•t.l'i'rr ' «' r ; : ti..- f)..v ..t :mp,.rt- bar. Vr , rW-rk.-f! vf h«vi na.'l iinntt|)|i» • f-ia! f i.-IM' "f I'l.noH .if r-M-rv • Jump New j l. r-ii -■;( nrriru the Your-, etc \.r, Mirrh -> i

v? -"* e:-« '* ' p i' r -••• Sir.—Ywr Jeadi.-r a '.vflcomt re- » -dtr :r.&' « ntr.v i-utkf'k is needed •eesrda- unemployment problems. V:t .<that there has been no pub- •» -an '"-hat is. outside the ranks of ; '"e Social Credit Movement; who has -oie forward to point out the dosirof regarding unemployment as vl asset in itself. when that unemj'sjment was not accompanied by a siftage of goods" The object of jiboiir is to produce the uoods we rfs3'uir<-- If. ov.-irr,' to the introduction methods and improved sadJiaery, only a portion of the people fin be so employed, it i-ecnis reasonaie to allow the unemployed sulliHenf !M99l to obtain a fairer living without marking. Tae orthodox per.-on immediately test seme hidden danger m providing *ae means of livelihood without work, ari the provision of a national divides! is regarded as a step that will Esdennifle the nation's morality. But •n£ notion, held by eminent econor.s.s a? well as the average man. does apply to the domestic field. There r,o great outcr> that the married newt are only partially employed the introduction of bay wash, wsiikg machines. vacuum cleaners, ir-d electric cooker.--. No great outer)' "that domestic workers are being itsciriiaed: on the contrary, the

.Msnrife is recognised as being bet-

'•« ofi. aid she evc-n does not regard Israeli es a subject icr pity, but as J titer *snan. now able to devote her to those things which she wishes 10 co other than those tilings she is obliged to do. Teas a new outlook is needed, for *ia* opportunity is there for the de"Tiopment of our intellectual and spiritual nature-, when men's lives in gentr»! arc summed up in lhat comic but •lEfually true saying: "We go to work '■'j set the cash to buy the food to get tnestrength to go to work to get the ten."—yours, ptc K. A. LOVELL-SMITH. Meet 5, 1935.