WAGES AND PURCHASING POWER.
TO THE EDITOB Or THE IRESS. Sir, —In the. report of the Economic Committee it is said that lowering wages does not lower purchasing power. Of course, any schoolboy knows that if the cost ol everything —food, clothing, housing, amusements, etc. —is lowered in proportion to the "cuts," purchasing power will not be lowered, But what do we find in connexion with the last cuts? Sugar is dearer, as are most lines of house furnishing and clothes; newspapers are still J->d each; a unit of lighting current in the country is still cightpence, a letter is twopence, and a telegram one shilling. The fall in foods was not due to the "cuts," but to lower prices abroad, which the "cuts" cannot effect. The cost of food, it is to be remembered, is only a small part of the total expenditure in modern life. It must be remembered that employees form at least three-fourths of the whole population, and any restrictions of their purchasing power hits manufacturers, storekeepers, and farmers badly.— Yours, etc., LUX. March 9th, 193"2.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19320310.2.36.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20492, 10 March 1932, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
180WAGES AND PURCHASING POWER. Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20492, 10 March 1932, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.