Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Local Body Finance.

It was reported in yesterday's Press that the Minister for Public Works has informed County Councils in the Auckland district that, owing to the Government's financial position, all road authorities held by local bodies are cancelled until further notice. This decision applies to the grants made by Parliament out. of the Public Works Fund for approved construction and maintenance work on roads and bridges, and does not, apparently, affect authorities granted" under the Main Highways Act. It is to be hoped that the Minister will without delay issue a statement explaining more fully what his action involves and what policy the Government intends to pursue in future in regard to these grants. In particular, it would be interesting to know why Auckland local bodies are the only ones to receive the notification, and' why it has been necessary to take this step only a few weeks before the end of the financial year for local bodies. There can be no doubt that considerable inconvenience will be caused to County Councils in Auckland, Otago, and Southland, which lean heavily on the Public Works Fund, but the Minister will readily be forgiven his abruptness if he has in mind a drastic reform of this department of local body finance. The increase in these special grants since the War is in itself enough to warrant a thorough overhaul of the system, for while in 1919 their total was only-£156,354, by 1929 they had risen to £1,515,128, and last year, despite economies, the total was £1,075,000. It is hard to see what has happened in ten years to justify this startling increase, which goes a long way towards explaining why local body expenditure has nearly doubled itself over the same period. The system is in itself an incitement to extravagance, for local bodies are in effect invited to get what they can from Parliament, either as a straight grant or on a subsidy basis varying from £1 for £1 to as much as £4 for £L The applications for grants must, it is true, be sifted by the engineers of the Public Works Department, but the final word as to what grants are put on the Estimates to go before Parliament is with the Minister. The system is bad for two reasons, the first being that Parliament's consent to the building of a road in the hinterland of North Auckland or the West Coast is no more than an absurd formality, and the second being that such a large proportion of local government revenue ought not to take the form of special grants. The direct financial dependence of local bodies on Parliament is most undesirable, and it can only be eliminated by stabilising their sources of income.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19320308.2.47

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20490, 8 March 1932, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
456

Local Body Finance. Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20490, 8 March 1932, Page 8

Local Body Finance. Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20490, 8 March 1932, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert