THE WATERLOW CASE.
K \l Mx f y*»yr ' * ; BANft Otf PdKTUGA^S ' ' - ' >\pLAi[k.Jj:7 ;^.,v 1 , I, --■■ - -f * *- > V jf,|f\ TO PAY 5589,421. 1 , waosc om» «w* coawfs/oKJHSjrr,) LONDON, »%Uilry 15." The action in Which tin Satfpo 4« Portugal was awarded-damages against Messrs Waterlcjw \6ons,* '(Jredt Winchester'street, E.C., for breach of, contract and negligencein caimexijjn with the- cirfculation' 'of certain Portuguese bank notes, was again before the Court this Week" f - j; Mr Justice Wright had f6u»4 that the,, bank was entitled to £631,851 damages, l but Mr Norman Birkett liiaintained that 1 Messrs Waterlow were entitled to certain allowances, and it vsyis on the ques-* tion* of the amount of damages that the matter now came before" 1 jbisVLord-' ship. 1 " ' ' Mr Stuart Bevan pointed •. out\ that, the whole a&ount of th,c claim 1 wis £1,100,281, and the figure of £631,851 was arrived at bydeduqting which had been recovered bytho ißanco de Portugal from the liquidation'of tie. conspirators' assets, and a further sum of £BO,OOO In respect of the failure to minimise the damages. - In Mr Sevan's yubhussion, if 3130,000 were Allowed toWaterlow and Sons, Md v Only £408,430 should Ue allowed them in. wjpect of the liquidation «f , , -- <V? , ) ' U - , - ?„/
■■■■» I I' ■ , H "'V» the conspttatttts.'.aßßpt^">lift'lrftjqjWKsf'; the Banco £BO,OOO, WatcrlosrfWLd |SS ttndor no- liability. • 4 s Mr Socman Birket&'iaainttiaftd ttaft Messrs whole of been held that Hank'' eonli'injttf ipfcf cover that auto. aofiOtiafe^of * fault. In fonvortiug_thß sums alhnroA to MeßWs Watatiovr oacudoß into the zajte, of- '.to* 1 c bruise should bo tfurt at the tfaw ci the low, and not the present or'a littff Tate. If lhbt Ivore done'£lo,ooo jranld be saved to Messru 'Waterlow SitHti, Ltdy ia. One parii«nlar.v; -*vf. Mr Justice .Wxig&t regard to the credit. item ■ the sum ought to be abated by /-Onß- i thirteenth. "faith fegtrtL of the rate df exchange, the r%te vailing at the tiafc -ths- 'fttlyJhgev made t&tmld bfc thff;iatr f After the patties hid regard v to the figures it that it had been agreed thict should be entered fot the Biuigo. de Portugal fur £060,421, vrth costs.< < I ■ There - execatiott* for 14 days, and if*-within Messrs Watttloy and Sons to the satisfaction of Portugal aii.l gave notice of * apgeal,' there iwoutd be a atay until the Ju&rfng of tho appeal. ' . " > -jf 1 - ; Messrs Waterlow and Sons,.- in - an official statement of 'the action, infoym tjhfr that whatever may bo/the come of the proceeding? "jba'.thft the rcGolirces of* the company ate ample to ajiy eventuality, And that the efficient* conduct of th% vosittesS "Will lie in no way impaired. 1 t, '■>
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19310227.2.94
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20173, 27 February 1931, Page 15
Word count
Tapeke kupu
431THE WATERLOW CASE. Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20173, 27 February 1931, Page 15
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.