INCLUSION OF ITALIANS.

Press, Volume LXVI, Issue 20106, 9 December 1930, Page 11

INCLUSION OF IT ALIANS.

I allowed to H I® 1 LAND. i,» !S CENEONLINE R 'SD E c K. association— by electiuc jL,„.d 9n " > m ' BBISBANE, December 8. ■ . - prohibited Italians aboard the II 01 " jy 15 were allowed to land. aboard made an angry Konthe decks__ fj-MIJIENT ON AUSTRALIA'S M decision. INOFFICIAL PROTEST YET. M jjjeeived December Bth, 7 p.m.) IS LONDON, December 8. In Borne correspondent of "The Jji states: The exclusion of ItalM from Australia has not yet been 111 nbiect of an official protest and Kit been given special prominence ■ 18 Press. The few comments pub-li-i'ti *» studiously moderate. It is that the Italians have every Mm to disembark and tho Australian glial to allow them to do so is unal 1 , Here is reason to exclude Mf" ]t and hard-working men since Jt| k is available for. everybody. Aus--11,, sc tion is ascribed to uncom ||Ui«g determination to protect the Pfffrtandafd of living, despite the Lit that Italian labour has been large®i 'mstrumental "in creating the cong9*tu of prosperity which the council enjoying to-day." 'qmor Mussolini, in an article in i. n «ipaper, "U Popolo d'ltalia" "tint the exclusion has painfully -.'•■ressed public opinion and should ba abject of a protest, because "it is that little national units should Irioit vast regions and prohibit others id oily from dividing the fruits thereby also ffom work which increases jaM."—"The Times" Cables. SOME, December 7. 'Tie dfama developing in Sydney i laMjfing to our people and our alioiality," says "II Lavoro d 'ltalia,'' iliijj tlat Draconian edicts are issued LabouriieSj who preach alternationam, but ostracise Italians. "D Popolo d'ltalia " refers to AusiSian egotism, and declares that the itlfflion of Italians is immoral and innu, in view of tho fact that ii; were Allies In the World War.