PENALTIES FOR TEACHERS.

Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 19166, 24 November 1927, Page 8

PENALTIES FOR TEACHERS.

REPLY TO DEPARTMJa |§I ■ INSTITUTE'S CABB.'"' $| B (raws ABSOCIMIO* TBJo,Ub M|§| WELLINGTON, KowigrffiiH Comment on the Bduc ! ment V examination of the ' JjM clause in the Education «g| Bill was made to-day by Parkinson, secretary of the JJVBB land Educational Institute. *»%££ they occur in the Depar ment were referred to u Hlt m Representations made by m> Education Boards--»Two <JJ*ffi important Boards have /*«*s& U pudiated the clause, and »»<« known not to have been eonc« lt The only penalty an <f fjH&. can indict on a tMcberU" "By no means. The expre«JJ « of a board is a thing fttj gJtf. worthy of the n«merOßW» t^ ingly or regard 1 gbti... "«, „f 'I.. a sufficient check on '*»» w j J/ minor character,' thes« eei» » a minor character, and W> *M^ punishment is dismissal *■ tf , System affords a much better discipline. It affect* the , prospect of promotion <>»< l ■"* ■? 1&£ his salary to some extent. &*»>£ The teachers say that W ,£3|H| fine would be a elur ■» w^ t *fflH| of teachers as a »J*^J«B| ment provided, *^ v rattdjS would bo an »»* tcacher-«'Teacherehavewt»J» iJ^» the public service in *"%Mffi| They have said, and th \J "JM§|| the character of thetf °Wj«™» not deserved this » na ' f i fflflgm less deservedi, it .rfjtojK They should not punity to ignore thejJ'M of their head Boards-" Certainly Dismissal is the those who are guilty described. Mtij wySJHM no remedy, nor "Mmmffigagm of the teaching service D proposal to inflict them. \smM