Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TURNED DOWN.

RUSSIAN TREATIES.

STERN NOTE TO SOVIET.

DUPLICITY AND PROPAGANDA. (BT CiBLE—PKISS ASSOCIATXaS—COPXWaaT) (BKCTEB's TKLEOIUMS.) (Received November 23rd, 5.5 p.m.) LONDON, November 22. Tho Foreign Office, in a Note to M Rakovsky. says tli&b after due deliberation, his Majesty's Government is unable to recommend the treaties signed on August Bth to the consideration of Parliament or to submit them to the King for ratification.

A separate Note to M. ltakovsky retarding tho Zinovieff letter says that M. Itakor&ky undertook to declare, apparently upon internal evidence alone and without allow ing time for reference to Moscow, that the Zinovieff letter was a gross, forgery, in support of which M. Rakovsky alleged that the Communist International was never, iu its own circulars described as the Third Communist International, that Zinovieff never signs sis President of the executive committee of tho Communist International, and that the whole contents av® a tissue of absurdities. Mr Austen Chamberlain says His Majesty's Government- cannot accept, these assertions which o.re disproved by reference to official publications and the Soviet Press.

The Noto continues:; —"But it is unnecessary to enter into details because the information in possession of His Majesty's Government leuvei no doubt in their mind of the authenticity of tho Zinovieff lotter, therefore they nro net. prepared to discuss tho matter. You misapprehend tho character of t-lio representations of my predecessors if you supposed tliey doaJt with M. Zinoviefl's let tor only, i'he activities of which liu Majesty's Government complain are not confined to tills particular letter, but extend to tho whole body of re-, volutionary propaganda, of which the letter is «. fair specimen, which sometimes is conducted secretly and sometimes, as you rightly remark, is unconcealed. The pronouncements of Zinovieff, broadcast, throughout tho world, are in themselves sufficient evidence of propaganda in which tho Third International, with tho knowledge of the Soviet Government, continually indulges, and this system, in tho view of His Majesty's Government, is inconsistent w:ith tho solemn undertakings of your Government in tho Noto of October 24th to Mr Ramsay Macl>onald.

Mr Chamberlain observes that nobody who understands the constitution and | relationships of the Communist International will doubt its intimato connexion s;nd contact with' the Soviet Government. He further observes that "No Government can ever tolerate ail arrangement with a foreign Govern- | ment by which'the latter is in formal diplomatic relations of a. correct kind with it, whilst at tho time a prop:'.gand'isni body . organically connected "with that foreign Government, encourages, even orders, subjects of the former to plot and plan revolutions for its overthrow. This is true, and the Soviet Government will do well to weigh carefully tho consequences ol ignoring this pronouncement." The "Daily Herald" commenting on the Note to the Soviet, says tho Govcrflment is anxious to hush up the Zinovieff letter, but the Labour Party will insist upon a complete clearing up of its,mysteries and the exposure of the fraud by which the election was won at the price of provoking an international crisis.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19241124.2.84

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume LX, Issue 18238, 24 November 1924, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
497

TURNED DOWN. Press, Volume LX, Issue 18238, 24 November 1924, Page 9

TURNED DOWN. Press, Volume LX, Issue 18238, 24 November 1924, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert