SOUTH CANTERBURY.
Ip-* TIMARU. ||j? ' social and Personal. '•fir. and Mrs Maurice Harper and • petty Harper (Kinnoull) motored Wrt-riatehnrch yesterday. TV olive Lvon (Highfield) is stayth Mrs Donald McLean (Little Agnes Hassell (North street) ' : S&erday °a a visit to Mrs Harold ' ISher (Albury). -a Baxter (Opawa) is the guest Mrs W. W. Baxter (Wai-iti Wr James Meehan left Thnaru yes- . s hort visit to Chnstcliurch. >#iKd Mrs J. A. Roberts who were |yg n g Timaru, have returned to fl® 1 The Weather. nn unpromising appearance the weather cleared iZe iow and the day was one of sunshine. lyf Magistrate's Court. JRL Co-operative Freezing Company Sffintb Canterbury, Ltd., yesterday iSSed against R. S. Gillingham for iKi of £5 for shares alleged to lit# been purchased by him in SepWLr 1920. Mr W. D. Campbell ap.C'llr pldntiE =»d, M' W- A - represented defendant Mr Campbell said that on September ®efendant made an application for which were allotted on Septem'Sft The secretary of the comlEv Wde out the allotments and "i&fcflthem. Defendant did not pay > 10- on application, nor the 10s on ' ;J,it. Notices were sent him, but ' \aiiiTii» was heard of him. I - ffH Fraser, secretary to the'eomf said defendant had made appli- \ ffitt for shares. No money was paid n ,1 all. The company was now .m liqui- ' Scott: He had not received ' letters from the defendant nor had • t*«seflived a returned allotment with > A footnote attached. defence was that the application ,PL JJ«res-was withdrawn the day after • rtif&DTJlication was signed. H'SefeSdant said he had told one of jeimpanv's canvassers that he take five shares, but the day follEX decided'not/ to take the ilSßtti a#d told the, canvasser to that Igßfeß lie'latter'said the application in. and that defendant could After some talk it was agreed that the application 'he withdrawn. He had not ilfiSalered further until receiving a fs&*rta plaintiff's - solicitors COniHj&'the non-payment of the shares. IpMuWahip said he would have to that there was adequate iiriMttwal of the application by word 13 From the evidence he was on this point, and judgiJlwmia be for plaintiff for .the. kiHMoSIt 1 claimed and costs, £1 18s. • ' , TEMUKA. inthly meeting of the comSe', Plunket Society, there Mesdames Armitag© (in Sheen, Wightman, Cross, mtyman, Thomson, Barker, .d Miss Eggleston. The ough Council wrote renewt' c*f £2O towards the eubInformation was receivH&yhurst in. regard to teat 98. :and it was agreed to !>,;.• A lettM ?vaa received, teraldine dqunty ..Council,: j$ in response to the Cfomvcted £3O from. Trust Funds. It was affijMeesre "Olsen and "Wood rod J- enough; to place, their this disposal of the Commit- • oiie day shop. It was rePlu'nket Nurse Hight had rk on-November Ist after .u.The Nurse's repcxt for showed 28 new cases, with o hopies and 210 patients , '"the office. The cat had IB- miles during the month.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19241113.2.28
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, Volume LX, Issue 18229, 13 November 1924, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
469SOUTH CANTERBURY. Press, Volume LX, Issue 18229, 13 November 1924, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.