Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED PROFITEERING.

t , , SALE OF SUBGICAL BOOTS. (HWBS ASSOCIATION TELEGRAM.) i AUCKLAND, April 4. The tearing of the defence in the awe in which Ernest E. Learning, bootmaker, Queen street, is charged witfb. having sold a pair of surgical boots at a price which was unreasonably high, namely, £4 19a 6d, was resumed before Mr E. C. Cutten, S.M., in the Magistrate's Court to-day. "William James Hammill, formerly managing director of, and a partner in, Murray and Co., Ltd., and president of tile New Zealand Boot Manufacturers' " Association, said from the cost of production and durability point of view, ' the defendant's boots could not bo fairly -* compared with ordinary factory-mndo boots. <■ Cross-examined, witness said that'£4 » 19a 6dwas a fair prico in tihe light of the price of labour and materials, quoted ♦ by the defendant. The Magistrate asked witness in what ' manner lie had brought his knowledge to be &r on the case if he had taken defendant's word for the cost of production. .Witness replied flhat he used his technical knowledge of production, tho output, and time taken. After further questioning, the Magistrate remarked that, after oil, witness gave evidence only on information supJ plied by defendant at his fectory when witness -was making an inspection. Dr Purchas said he knew of no other manufacturer in Auckland who supplied a type of surgical boot constructed to afford fixed support to the arch of tihe foot. Witness had sent patients to defendant. Recently, a wounded officer , who had been fitted with a surgical boot * at the London Orthopaedic Hospital had ordered a new pair of boots troni defendant, and after wearing them said ( they were cheaper and of better work- > S'Bwi'P'than tne P air ho obtained in England. Witness had found defendant ', expert at making boots to special rhea,J aurements, an accomplishment not post/aessed by ordinary makers. S Ira Joseph Sutherland, managing salesjj man for Sutherland and Co., tanners, \ »W defendant always bought tho oe3t , quality leather. &-' jthe case was adjourned.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19210405.2.43

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume LVII, Issue 17111, 5 April 1921, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
330

ALLEGED PROFITEERING. Press, Volume LVII, Issue 17111, 5 April 1921, Page 7

ALLEGED PROFITEERING. Press, Volume LVII, Issue 17111, 5 April 1921, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert