User accounts and text correction are temporarily unavailable due to site maintenance.
×
Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STRAP HANGERS.

;—f,

AX AUCKLAND INCIDENT

A rather inteiesting case came before Air J. E. Wilson, S.M., m. the Auckland Magistrate's Court last week, when a man named Joseph Thornes was charged with having obstructed a tram conductor in the execution of his duty. The circumstances outlined were that 1 just on 5 p.m. an Onehungatram startI od from the Quoen street terminus, and whan it reached the Thames Hotel corner theie was a rush lor places; some would-be passengers were crowded off. Mr Thornes, the defendant, was one of the people asked to get off, and he declined on the ground that he was entitled by the notice in the car, "o'J seated, 14 standing," to be carried to his destination, as there were not that number in the car. That notice, Mr A. E. Skelton contended on behalf of the defendant, was an invitation by the Tramwav Company to the public to occupy the cars to that extent. It was stated in evidence that the company was not compelled to carry any people standing, but made it a practice to carry fourteen. His Worship pointed- out that the cars were not licensed to carry any particular number of passengers, and that defendant's action, whether or not he considered he was within his rights, did in fact delay this car several minutes, as well as keeping back other cars. It obstructed the conductor in his duty of assisting to have the car kept up to schedule time, and defendant would have been more reasonable and better advised to have got off when-requested, and to have tesiecr 1 his rights by legal action later against the company in damages for unlawful removal from the car. Defendant would be convicted and fined 20s, and -13s i costs. j

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19190122.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume LV, Issue 16427, 22 January 1919, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
297

STRAP HANGERS. Press, Volume LV, Issue 16427, 22 January 1919, Page 4

STRAP HANGERS. Press, Volume LV, Issue 16427, 22 January 1919, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert