Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NEW ORDER.

TO TUE EDITOR OF "THE PRESS." Sir, —It is not often that I agree with Dr. Thacker, but I must endorse the protest which he made last night aga.'nst the undue discrimination used in the distribution ol : the Order of the British Empire. I coul.'i name thirty or forty people far more entitled to the honour than some of those who are the fortunate recipients. Such invidious distinctions are likely to cause a good deal of dissatisfaction, for wiuch. reason 1 would suggest that every person doing voluntary war work should receive recognition, or, as on alternative, no muvk of ■ distinction shouid be conferred upon any warworker. The satisfaction of knowing that one has done a good deed should be sufficient reward.—l'ours, etc., VIATOR. March 18th.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19180319.2.15.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume LIV, Issue 16164, 19 March 1918, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
129

THE NEW ORDER. Press, Volume LIV, Issue 16164, 19 March 1918, Page 4

THE NEW ORDER. Press, Volume LIV, Issue 16164, 19 March 1918, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert