CANTERBURY v. NEW ZEALAND.
TO THE EDITOR OF "THE PHESS." Sir,—Are we having too much cricket or could it be managed to have a match played in Christchurch. Canterbury v. the Rest of New Zealand 'f It would be a great "draw." and prove a success financially. Another match I would like to see pb.yed would be the Canterbury defenders of the Plunket Shield v. the seven Canterbury mem-
bere of the >,ow Zealand team bow » L Australia, with any four other lerbury players they choose- to pick?? J hat also should prove a great '■ and I would "plunk it" for the -L -" fenders. My sympathies are whfc '■-' the selector who lias to choose the next : representative Canterbury team for " out of the defenders alone he must consider chances of AYhitta, Woodl : BoaK Bi«hop. Monaghan? WW Paterson and CaygJU. Addingto these tho seven now in Australia, whs — is ho to leave out?— Yours, etc SPECTATOR.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19140128.2.26.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Press, Volume L, Issue 14886, 28 January 1914, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
155CANTERBURY v. NEW ZEALAND. Press, Volume L, Issue 14886, 28 January 1914, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in