Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN UNUSUAL CASE.

LIBEL ACTION OVER DEATH NOTICE.

(By Coble. —Prose Association—Copyright.)MELBOURNE, November 26. An unusual type of Jibel case has begun in the County Court. Florence Mabel Webbe, of Waverley, Sydney, claimed £1000 from tho newspaper "Age" as damages for libel. The facts were that Mrs Webbe, who was formerly Miss Hobson, married Nicholas Percy Webbe, a professional shorthand writer, formerly a member of the Federal ■ "Hansard" staff, and a well-known oarsman, on January Bth, 1912. About June, 1912, Webbe and his wife took up their residence at Waverley, Sydney! They lave no children, but on March 24th, 1913, a death notice appeared in the "Age," purporting to announce the death of an eleven months' old son of Webbe and his wife at their residence at Waverley. Plaintiff's counsel said the advertisement conveyed the impression that a child had been born about April, 1912, and might convey the impression that misconduct had taken place between Mr and Mrs Webbo before their marriage. The defence was that the advertisement was not defamatory either to those knowing nothing of the parties or to those intimately'acquainted with them. The "Ago ,, received a copy of the advertisement purporting to bo signed by Nicholas P. Webbe, and taking it as genuine, inserted it. Plaintiff gave evidence that she had not authorised the advertisement. Her husband's signature on the marringe certificate was nothing like tho signature on the advertisement. Edward Shaw, a handwriting expert, gave evidence that he thought the signatures of Nicholas P. Webbe on the marriage register and on the two copies of tho advertisement were written by the same man. The case was adjourned. It was stated that the same advertisement appeared in the "Argus."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19131127.2.57

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume XLIX, Issue 14834, 27 November 1913, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
283

AN UNUSUAL CASE. Press, Volume XLIX, Issue 14834, 27 November 1913, Page 7

AN UNUSUAL CASE. Press, Volume XLIX, Issue 14834, 27 November 1913, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert