Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NECKLACE CASE.

POSTAL OFFICIALS' EVIDENCE

(By Cable.—Pxeea Association—Copyright.) LONDON, November 21.

In the pearl necklace case, Neville, a postman, in his evidence, said that he delivered the necklace packet intact. He knew both Silverman and Gutwith, and emphatically denied receiving money from them. He had never been promised any money, directly or indirectly.

Holland, Neville's assistant, said that he carried the registered bag. Neville had not tampered with its contents.

A mail sorter on the Dover train testified that he had noticed an irregularity in the seals of Mayer's packet, suggesting that it had already been tampered with.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19131124.2.50

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume XLIX, Issue 14831, 24 November 1913, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
99

THE NECKLACE CASE. Press, Volume XLIX, Issue 14831, 24 November 1913, Page 7

THE NECKLACE CASE. Press, Volume XLIX, Issue 14831, 24 November 1913, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert